Meet Your Tutor
Alcohols, Phenols and Ethers becomes much easier when every reaction is attached to structure, acidity and the behaviour of the C-O bond. I will help you compare the three families before memorising reagents, then use small conversion maps and product checks so named reactions feel connected instead of random.
If you have opened this page because Alcohols, Phenols and Ethers Class 12 Chemistry looks like a wall of forty unrelated reactions, take a breath. It is not forty reactions. It is one idea, wearing forty costumes. Every single thing this chapter asks you to remember — why phenol dissolves in sodium hydroxide but ethanol does not, why the Lucas test takes five minutes for one alcohol and no time at all for another, why a nitro group on a ring changes everything — comes back to a single question: once the oxygen has let go of its hydrogen, how comfortable is the negative charge left behind?
That question is what we are going to call the acidity ladder, and it is the spine of this whole page. We will build the ladder early, then hang every preparation, every property and every named reaction off it. By the end you will not be reciting reactions; you will be predicting them. That is the difference between six marks and two.
This is Unit 7 of the CBSE Class 12 Chemistry course for 2026-27 and it carries 6 marks in the 70-mark theory paper. Along the way you will get Alcohols, Phenols and Ethers with solved examples, a full reaction and reagent list, the identification tests laid out as a single lab-bench decision flow, and a practice worksheet with worked answers. Read it slowly. Nothing here needs to be memorised twice.
What You’ll Learn
- Classification of Alcohols, Phenols and Ethers
- IUPAC Nomenclature and the Structure of the Functional Groups
- The Acidity Ladder — the Master Idea
- Preparation of Alcohols
- Preparation of Phenols
- Physical Properties: Hydrogen Bonding, Boiling Point, Solubility
- Chemical Reactions of Alcohols
- Telling 1°, 2° and 3° Alcohols Apart
- Chemical Reactions of Phenols
- Preparation of Ethers
- Properties and Reactions of Ethers
- Some Commercially Important Alcohols
- The Lab-Bench Identification Decision Flow
Your Game Plan
- Spend fifteen minutes on the acidity ladder alone. Do not move on until you can draw it from memory and say why each rung sits where it does.
- Learn nomenclature next. Half the marks lost in this unit are lost on names, not on chemistry.
- Do the preparations as a table, not as prose — reagent in the left column, product in the right.
- Attack the reactions of phenol in one sitting, because they are all consequences of the same ring.
- Finish with ethers. They are the short, easy marks, and students routinely leave them for a day that never comes.
- Then close the book and walk through the identification decision flow in your head, twice.
Study Notes
Classification of Alcohols, Phenols and Ethers
Three families, one shared feature: a carbon atom joined to an oxygen atom by a single bond. What changes is what else that oxygen is holding, and what kind of carbon it is attached to.
An alcohol has –OH sitting on an sp3 (tetrahedral, single-bonded) carbon. A phenol has –OH sitting directly on an sp2 carbon of an aromatic ring. An ether has the oxygen sandwiched between two carbon groups with no hydrogen of its own: R–O–R′. That last detail — no O–H — is the reason ethers behave so differently, and it is worth writing on the inside cover of your notebook.
Alcohols are sorted three ways. First by how many –OH groups: monohydric (ethanol), dihydric (ethane-1,2-diol), trihydric (propane-1,2,3-triol), and polyhydric beyond that. Second by which carbon carries the –OH: primary (1°) if that carbon is attached to one other carbon, secondary (2°) if two, tertiary (3°) if three. Third, by the neighbourhood: an allylic alcohol has the –OH carbon next door to a C=C double bond, and a benzylic alcohol has it next door to a benzene ring.
Phenols are sorted only by count: monohydric (phenol), dihydric (benzene-1,2-diol, benzene-1,3-diol, benzene-1,4-diol), trihydric (benzene-1,2,3-triol). Ethers are sorted by symmetry: symmetrical or simple when both groups are identical (ethoxyethane), unsymmetrical or mixed when they differ (methoxyethane), and an alkyl aryl ether when one of the two is a ring (methoxybenzene).
Answer. (a) 1° monohydric alcohol. (b) 2° monohydric alcohol. (c) 3° monohydric alcohol. (d) 1° benzylic alcohol — the –OH carbon is sp3 and sits next to the ring, not on it. (e) 1° allylic alcohol. (f) a phenol, because here the –OH is bonded straight to the sp2 ring carbon.
Marker’s note: (d) and (f) are the pair examiners love. Benzyl alcohol is an alcohol; phenol is not.
IUPAC Nomenclature and the Structure of the Functional Groups
Naming is the cheapest mark in the unit and the one most often thrown away. There are only four habits to build.
- Alcohols: find the longest carbon chain that contains the –OH carbon, drop the final “e” of the alkane and add “-ol”. Number the chain so the –OH gets the lowest possible locant — the –OH beats a double bond and beats an alkyl branch.
- Two or more –OH groups: keep the final “e” and add -diol, -triol. So it is ethane-1,2-diol, not ethan-1,2-diol.
- Phenols: the parent name is simply phenol, and the carbon carrying the –OH is C-1 by definition. Substituents are then numbered to get the lowest set.
- Ethers: the larger group is the parent alkane; the smaller one becomes an alkoxy prefix. CH3–O–CH2CH3 is methoxyethane, not ethoxymethane.
| Structure | IUPAC name | Common name (still worth knowing) |
|---|---|---|
| CH3OH | methanol | methyl alcohol / wood spirit |
| CH3CH(OH)CH3 | propan-2-ol | isopropyl alcohol |
| (CH3)3COH | 2-methylpropan-2-ol | tert-butyl alcohol |
| CH2=CH–CH2OH | prop-2-en-1-ol | allyl alcohol |
| C6H5CH2OH | phenylmethanol | benzyl alcohol |
| HOCH2CH2OH | ethane-1,2-diol | ethylene glycol |
| HOCH2CH(OH)CH2OH | propane-1,2,3-triol | glycerol |
| C6H5OH | phenol | carbolic acid |
| 2-CH3–C6H4–OH | 2-methylphenol | o-cresol |
| 1,2-(OH)2C6H4 | benzene-1,2-diol | catechol |
| 1,3-(OH)2C6H4 | benzene-1,3-diol | resorcinol |
| 1,4-(OH)2C6H4 | benzene-1,4-diol | quinol / hydroquinone |
| CH3OCH3 | methoxymethane | dimethyl ether |
| C2H5OC2H5 | ethoxyethane | diethyl ether |
| C6H5OCH3 | methoxybenzene | anisole |
| CH3–O–C(CH3)3 | 2-methoxy-2-methylpropane | tert-butyl methyl ether |
Structure of the functional groups. In an alcohol the oxygen is sp3 hybridised, so the C–O–H arrangement is bent, with an angle a little smaller than the perfect tetrahedral 109.5°. Two lone pairs on the oxygen crowd the bonding pairs and squeeze the angle shut. In an ether, R–O–R′, the same oxygen now has two bulky carbon groups instead of one carbon and one small hydrogen, so they push apart and the C–O–C angle opens out slightly beyond the tetrahedral value.
In a phenol the picture changes qualitatively. The –OH is attached to an sp2 ring carbon, and one lone pair of the oxygen overlaps with the ring’s π system. That overlap gives the C–O bond partial double-bond character, so the C–O bond in phenol is measurably shorter than the C–O bond in methanol. It also builds a small positive charge on the oxygen — and an oxygen carrying a partial positive charge is far more willing to let its hydrogen go. Hold onto that sentence; it is the entire acidity story in advance.
Answer. (a) Longest chain through the –OH carbon is four carbons; –OH is on C-1; a methyl sits on C-2 → 2-methylbutan-1-ol (1°). (b) Five-carbon chain, –OH on C-2 → pentan-2-ol (2°). (c) Four-carbon chain, –OH on C-2, methyl on C-2 → 2-methylbutan-2-ol (3°). (d) Cyclohexanol — no locant is needed because the –OH carbon is automatically C-1.
Answer. (a) Propane is bigger than methyl → 1-methoxypropane. (b) Propane chain with the ethoxy on C-2 → 2-ethoxypropane. (c) The larger group is (CH3)3C–, i.e. a propane chain carrying a methyl branch, and the methoxy sits on the same carbon → 2-methoxy-2-methylpropane. (d) The ring is the parent → ethoxybenzene (common name phenetole).
Answer. First the degree of unsaturation: (2×7 + 2 − 8) ÷ 2 = 4. Four degrees is the classic fingerprint of one benzene ring (three C=C plus the ring itself), with nothing left over. So the oxygen must be in a saturated arrangement hanging off a benzene ring. That leaves exactly three families: the three cresols (2-, 3- and 4-methylphenol), phenylmethanol (benzyl alcohol), and methoxybenzene (anisole). Five isomers in total.
Now notice how one drop of FeCl3 would split them: violet colour → a cresol; no colour → benzyl alcohol or anisole.
The Acidity Ladder — the Master Idea
Here is the ladder, and here is the single rule that builds it. When an O–H bond breaks, the hydrogen leaves as H+ and a negatively charged oxygen is left behind — the conjugate base. If that negative charge can be shared out over several atoms, the conjugate base is comfortable, it forms readily, and the parent compound is a stronger acid. If the charge is stuck on one lonely oxygen, the conjugate base is unhappy, it does not form easily, and the parent is a weak acid. That is the whole mechanism of this chapter, stated once.
Climb the rungs from the bottom.
- Alcohols (bottom rung). R–O− keeps the entire charge on one oxygen, and the alkyl group actually pushes electron density towards that oxygen (+I effect), making the crowding worse. Alcohols are therefore weaker acids than water. Among alcohols the order is CH3OH > 1° > 2° > 3°, because each extra alkyl group pushes a little more.
- Water. HO− has no alkyl group pushing at it, so it is slightly better off than an alkoxide. Water sits just above alcohols.
- Phenol. Now the ring joins in. In the phenoxide ion the negative charge is delocalised from the oxygen into the ring, appearing at the ortho and para carbons. Charge shared over four centres instead of one — a huge jump. Phenol is roughly a million times more acidic than ethanol.
- Substituted phenols. Add an electron-withdrawing group such as –NO2 at the ortho or para position and it pulls even more charge away; the phenoxide gets even more comfortable and acidity rises again. Add an electron-donating group such as –CH3 or –OCH3 and it pushes charge back, so acidity falls slightly below plain phenol.
- Carboxylic acids (top rung). In RCOO− the charge is split equally between two identical oxygen atoms — the two C–O bonds become exactly the same length. Nothing in this chapter beats that.
The ladder immediately pays for itself with a reagent trick. Sodium metal is aggressive enough to react with anything from rung 1 upwards, so it fizzes with alcohols, phenols and carboxylic acids alike. Sodium hydroxide can only deprotonate things above water — so phenol dissolves in NaOH but ethanol does not. Sodium hydrogencarbonate is weaker still and only reacts with the top rung — so a carboxylic acid gives brisk CO2 effervescence and phenol gives nothing at all. Three bottles, three rungs, one clean separation.
| Reagent | Reacts with ethanol? | Reacts with phenol? | Reacts with a carboxylic acid? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Na metal | Yes — H2 evolved | Yes — H2 evolved | Yes — H2 evolved |
| aq. NaOH | No | Yes — dissolves as sodium phenoxide | Yes — forms the sodium salt |
| aq. NaHCO3 | No | No | Yes — brisk CO2 effervescence |
Model answer. ethanol < water < phenol < 4-nitrophenol.
Ethanol is weakest because the ethoxide ion holds the whole negative charge on one oxygen and the ethyl group’s +I effect intensifies it. Water is slightly stronger since hydroxide has no such alkyl group. Phenol is far stronger because the phenoxide ion delocalises the charge into the aromatic ring. 4-Nitrophenol is stronger still, because the –NO2 group at the para position withdraws electrons by both inductive and resonance effects, spreading the charge even further and stabilising the phenoxide ion.
Answer. (a) Phenol. The methyl group is electron-releasing (+I and hyperconjugation), so it pushes charge back onto the ring and destabilises the phenoxide. (b) 4-Nitrophenol. The nitro group withdraws electrons strongly, stabilising the phenoxide ion. (c) 2,4,6-Trinitrophenol (picric acid), and by a very wide margin — three nitro groups, all at positions where resonance withdrawal can reach the oxygen. It is acidic enough to behave like a mineral acid in the laboratory.
Pattern to carry away: electron-withdrawing groups at ortho and para raise acidity most, because only those positions carry the negative charge in the phenoxide resonance structures.
Preparation of Alcohols
Three families of route, and each one answers a different design question: where do I want the –OH to land?
(a) From alkenes — acid-catalysed hydration. Bubble the alkene through dilute acid and water adds across the double bond following Markovnikov’s rule: the –OH ends up on the more substituted carbon. The mechanism has three steps. The π electrons grab a proton to give the more stable carbocation; a water molecule attacks that carbocation; a second water molecule removes the extra proton. Because a carbocation is involved, rearrangements are possible — and that is exactly why the second method exists.
(b) From alkenes — hydroboration–oxidation. Treat the alkene with diborane, B2H6, to get a trialkylborane, then oxidise with alkaline hydrogen peroxide (H2O2 / OH−). The –OH lands on the less substituted carbon — an anti-Markovnikov result — and because no carbocation is ever formed, nothing rearranges. Boron and hydrogen add to the same face of the double bond, so the addition is syn.
(c) From carbonyl compounds by reduction. Feeding hydrogen into a C=O group knocks it down to C–OH. An aldehyde gives a 1° alcohol; a ketone gives a 2° alcohol. Any of H2 with a metal catalyst (Ni, Pd or Pt), sodium borohydride (NaBH4) or lithium aluminium hydride (LiAlH4) will do the job. Carboxylic acids are harder to reduce and need LiAlH4; industrially they are first converted to esters and the ester is then hydrogenated, because LiAlH4 is expensive.
(d) From Grignard reagents. This is the carbon-chain builder. R–Mg–X, made from an alkyl halide and magnesium in dry ether, attacks the carbonyl carbon; the adduct is then hydrolysed with dilute acid to release the alcohol. The class of alcohol you get is decided entirely by the carbonyl partner:
- Grignard + methanal (HCHO) → a 1° alcohol with one carbon more than the Grignard.
- Grignard + any other aldehyde → a 2° alcohol.
- Grignard + a ketone → a 3° alcohol.
Answer. (a) Markovnikov addition — the proton adds to C-1 to generate the secondary carbocation at C-2, so water attacks C-2: the product is butan-2-ol, a 2° alcohol. (b) Anti-Markovnikov — boron attaches to the terminal, less hindered carbon and is replaced by –OH on oxidation: the product is butan-1-ol, a 1° alcohol.
Answer. The carbinol carbon carries three carbon groups — two methyls and one ethyl — so we need a ketone plus a Grignard.
Route 1: propanone (CH3COCH3) + ethylmagnesium bromide, then hydrolysis with dilute acid.
Route 2: butanone (CH3COCH2CH3) + methylmagnesium bromide, then hydrolysis with dilute acid.
Both give a 3° alcohol, exactly as the ketone-plus-Grignard rule predicts. Mention “dry ether” in the conditions to secure the full mark.
Working. Molar mass of propene, C3H6 = 42.08 g mol−1, so moles of propene = 5.6 ÷ 42.08 = 0.1331 mol. The addition is 1 : 1, so the theoretical yield of propan-2-ol, C3H8O (molar mass 60.10 g mol−1), is 0.1331 × 60.10 = 8.00 g. At 80% yield the actual mass is 0.80 × 8.00 = 6.40 g.
Sanity check: hydration adds H2O, so the product must be heavier than the alkene — 8.00 g from 5.6 g is the right direction.
Answer. (a) NaBH4, or H2 over a nickel catalyst, or LiAlH4. (b) The same three — a ketone reduces just as easily as an aldehyde. (c) LiAlH4. This is the one that needs the stronger hydride reagent; NaBH4 is not powerful enough to touch a carboxylic acid, and catalytic hydrogenation leaves it alone as well.
If the arrow-pushing behind carbocation stability still feels shaky, the substitution and elimination groundwork sits one chapter earlier — work through our chapter on Haloalkanes and Haloarenes before you go further, because SN1, SN2 and carbocation rearrangement all reappear here in new clothes.
Preparation of Phenols
Four routes. Two are laboratory routes that force an –OH onto a ring; two are industrial. Learn them as reagent-plus-condition pairs, because that is exactly how they are examined.
| Route | Starting material | Reagents and conditions | Product |
|---|---|---|---|
| From haloarenes (Dow process) | Chlorobenzene | Fused NaOH at about 623 K and 300 atm, then acidify with dilute HCl | Phenol (via sodium phenoxide) |
| From benzenesulphonic acid | Benzene | Oleum / conc. H2SO4 → benzenesulphonic acid; neutralise with NaOH; fuse with molten NaOH; then acidify | Phenol (via sodium phenoxide) |
| From diazonium salts | Aniline | NaNO2 + HCl at 273–278 K → benzenediazonium chloride; then warm with water | Phenol + N2 + HCl |
| From cumene (industrial) | Cumene (isopropylbenzene) | Air (O2) → cumene hydroperoxide; then dilute acid | Phenol + propanone |
The haloarene route needs brutal conditions because the C–Cl bond in chlorobenzene has partial double-bond character and refuses to give up its chlorine easily. The sulphonic acid route works because the –SO3H group can be displaced by hydroxide when NaOH is molten. The diazonium route is the gentlest and cleanest — the diazonium group is such a good leaving group (it leaves as nitrogen gas) that warm water is all the reagent you need.
The cumene route is the one industry actually uses, and the reason is economic rather than chemical: it produces propanone (acetone) as a valuable by-product. That by-product is a favourite one-mark question, so do not let it slip past you.
Model answer. Cumene (isopropylbenzene) is oxidised by air. Atmospheric oxygen attacks the benzylic C–H of the isopropyl group to give cumene hydroperoxide. Treating this hydroperoxide with dilute acid causes it to rearrange and break apart, giving phenol together with propanone (acetone). The phenol is purified by distillation. The commercial attraction of the process is that acetone is itself a saleable product, so nothing is wasted.
Answer. (a) Diazotise the aniline with NaNO2 and HCl at 273–278 K to form benzenediazonium chloride, then simply warm the solution with water; phenol is released and nitrogen gas is evolved. (b) Sulphonate the benzene with concentrated sulphuric acid to give benzenesulphonic acid, neutralise it with sodium hydroxide, fuse the sodium salt with solid NaOH, then acidify the resulting sodium phenoxide with dilute acid.
Why not chlorobenzene for a laboratory question? Because 623 K and 300 atm are not laboratory conditions. Match the route to the setting the question describes.
Physical Properties: Hydrogen Bonding, Boiling Point, Solubility
One picture explains this whole section. An O–H group is a molecular hook: the oxygen is strongly electronegative, so the hydrogen carries a real partial positive charge and reaches out to the lone pair on a neighbouring oxygen. That is a hydrogen bond, and it means alcohol and phenol molecules cling to one another. An ether has no O–H hook at all, so ether molecules simply do not hold hands.
The consequence is dramatic. Ethanol and methoxymethane have exactly the same molecular formula, C2H6O, and exactly the same molar mass of 46 g mol−1. Ethanol is a liquid at room temperature that boils at around 78 °C. Methoxymethane is a gas — it boils far below room temperature. Same atoms, same mass, opposite states of matter, and the only difference is hydrogen bonding.
| Property | Alcohols | Phenols | Ethers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intermolecular H-bonding between its own molecules | Yes | Yes, and strongly | No |
| Boiling point vs. hydrocarbon of similar mass | Much higher | Much higher | Only slightly higher |
| H-bonding with water | Yes (donor and acceptor) | Yes | Yes — acceptor only |
| Solubility in water | High for small ones, falls as the chain grows | Limited but real; rises sharply in NaOH | Comparable to the isomeric alcohol |
| Reaction with Na metal | H2 evolved | H2 evolved | No reaction |
Boiling point within a set of isomers. For isomeric alcohols the order is 1° > 2° > 3°. Branching makes a molecule more spherical, which shrinks the contact area between neighbouring molecules and weakens the van der Waals forces, so the more branched isomer boils lowest. Across a homologous series, boiling point rises steadily with molar mass because there is simply more surface to attract.
Solubility in water. A small alcohol is essentially a water molecule wearing a short carbon coat — methanol, ethanol and propan-1-ol mix with water in all proportions. As the carbon chain lengthens the greasy hydrocarbon part starts to dominate and solubility falls away. Branching, oddly, helps: a branched alcohol has less surface area to hide from water, so 2-methylpropan-2-ol is more soluble than butan-1-ol.
Ethers are the interesting case. They cannot hydrogen-bond to each other, so their boiling points are low. But they can accept a hydrogen bond from a water molecule, so their solubility in water is roughly the same as that of the isomeric alcohol. Low boiling point, decent water solubility — the two facts feel contradictory until you separate “can it bond to its own kind?” from “can it bond to water?”
Answer. ethoxyethane < 2-methylpropan-2-ol < butan-2-ol < butan-1-ol.
All four have the formula C4H10O. Ethoxyethane is lowest because it has no O–H and therefore no hydrogen bonding between its own molecules. The three alcohols all hydrogen-bond, so they are all higher, and among them the order follows branching: 2-methylpropan-2-ol is the most branched and most nearly spherical, so its molecules touch least and it boils lowest of the three; butan-1-ol is a straight chain with maximum contact area and boils highest.
Working. The equation is 2 R–OH + 2 Na → 2 R–ONa + H2, so two moles of alcohol give one mole of hydrogen.
Moles of H2 = 0.224 L ÷ 22.4 L mol−1 = 0.0100 mol.
Moles of alcohol = 2 × 0.0100 = 0.0200 mol.
Molar mass = 0.92 g ÷ 0.0200 mol = 46 g mol−1.
C2H5OH has a molar mass of 46.07 g mol−1, so the alcohol is ethanol.
Trap avoided: the stoichiometry is 2 : 1, not 1 : 1. Forgetting that halves your molar mass and gives you the wrong compound.
Hydrogen bonding is also the reason alcohols behave so unusually as solvents and why their solutions show the deviations you met earlier — the treatment of ideal and non-ideal behaviour in our chapter on Solutions is the same physics seen from a different angle.
Chemical Reactions of Alcohols
An alcohol can be attacked in two completely different places, and sorting a reaction into one of these two boxes is most of the battle.
- Cleavage of the O–H bond. The hydrogen leaves. This is acid-like behaviour: reaction with sodium, and esterification.
- Cleavage of the C–O bond. The whole –OH leaves. This is substitution and elimination: reaction with HX, with PCl5, with SOCl2, and dehydration.
1. Reaction with active metals. 2 R–OH + 2 Na → 2 R–O−Na+ + H2. The product is a sodium alkoxide, and hydrogen gas fizzes off. Rate of reaction follows the acidity order: 1° > 2° > 3°.
2. Esterification. R–OH + R′COOH, warmed with a trace of concentrated H2SO4, gives the ester R′COOR plus water. The reaction is reversible, so the acid catalyst is also there to pull the equilibrium along, and removing water drives it further right. Acid chlorides and acid anhydrides do the same job irreversibly and faster; a base such as pyridine is added to mop up the HCl produced.
3. Reaction with hydrogen halides. R–OH + HX → R–X + H2O. The –OH is a poor leaving group, so it is first protonated to –OH2+, which leaves happily as water. Reactivity of the alcohol runs 3° > 2° > 1°, and of the halide acid HI > HBr > HCl. When the halide is chloride the reaction needs help, and that help is anhydrous zinc chloride — the Lucas reagent, which we come to in the next section.
4. Reaction with PCl5, PCl3 and SOCl2. These are the clean laboratory ways to swap –OH for –Cl. R–OH + PCl5 → R–Cl + POCl3 + HCl. 3 R–OH + PCl3 → 3 R–Cl + H3PO3. R–OH + SOCl2 → R–Cl + SO2 + HCl, which is the tidiest of all because both by-products are gases and escape, leaving pure alkyl chloride.
5. Dehydration. Heat ethanol with concentrated sulphuric acid at about 443 K and you get ethene. The mechanism is worth writing out in full, because CBSE asks for it by name.
- Protonation. The lone pair on the alcohol oxygen picks up a proton from the acid, giving a protonated alcohol, R–OH2+. Fast and reversible.
- Loss of water. The C–O bond breaks heterolytically and a water molecule departs, leaving a carbocation. This is the slow, rate-determining step.
- Loss of a proton. A base (a bisulphate ion or another alcohol molecule) removes a hydrogen from the carbon next to the positive centre, and the electrons of that C–H bond swing across to make the π bond. The alkene is formed and the catalyst is regenerated.
Because step 2 makes a carbocation, ease of dehydration follows carbocation stability: 3° > 2° > 1°. And when more than one alkene is possible, the more highly substituted alkene is the major product (Saytzeff’s rule). The idea of a rate-determining step is exactly the one you met in our chapter on Chemical Kinetics — the slowest step sets the pace for the whole sequence.
6. Oxidation and dehydrogenation. Oxidation here means adding oxygen or removing hydrogen from the carbon that carries the –OH. What you get depends on how many hydrogens that carbon has to give.
| Alcohol | PCC in CH2Cl2 (mild) | Hot KMnO4 or acidified K2Cr2O7 (strong) | Cu at 573 K (dehydrogenation) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1°, e.g. propan-1-ol | Propanal (stops at the aldehyde) | Propanoic acid | Propanal |
| 2°, e.g. propan-2-ol | Propanone | Propanone | Propanone |
| 3°, e.g. 2-methylpropan-2-ol | No reaction | Resists; only under drastic conditions does the chain break | Dehydration to 2-methylprop-1-ene, not oxidation |
Answer. (a) Butanal — PCC is mild and halts at the aldehyde. (b) Butanoic acid — the strong oxidant carries on past the aldehyde. (c) Butan-2-one — a secondary alcohol has only one hydrogen on the carbinol carbon, so oxidation stops at the ketone whatever the oxidant.
Model answer.
Step 1 — protonation. CH3CH2OH + H+ → CH3CH2OH2+. The oxygen lone pair accepts a proton, converting the poor leaving group –OH into the excellent leaving group H2O.
Step 2 — formation of the carbocation (slow, rate-determining). CH3CH2OH2+ → CH3CH2+ + H2O.
Step 3 — loss of a proton. A base removes a hydrogen from the adjacent carbon; those bonding electrons form the π bond, giving CH2=CH2, and H+ is returned to the acid.
Marks are usually split 1 + 1 + 1, with the word “rate-determining” on step 2 often carrying its own credit.
Answer. (a) At the lower temperature, with ethanol in excess, one molecule substitutes into another and the product is ethoxyethane (diethyl ether). (b) At the higher temperature elimination wins and the product is ethene. (c) Sodium attacks the O–H bond, giving sodium ethoxide and hydrogen gas.
Memory hook: lower temperature, lower drama — substitution to the ether; higher temperature, the molecule breaks apart into an alkene.
Telling 1°, 2° and 3° Alcohols Apart
Three bottles of colourless liquid, all smelling faintly of hospital corridors. How do you tell which is which? There are three standard methods and each one exploits a different consequence of the acidity-and-carbocation story.
Method 1 — the Lucas test. Lucas reagent is concentrated hydrochloric acid plus anhydrous zinc chloride. Zinc chloride is a Lewis acid; it grips the oxygen and helps water leave, so a carbocation forms. The alkyl chloride produced is insoluble in the reagent, so it shows up as a cloudiness or turbidity. How fast the cloud appears tells you the class of alcohol, because it tells you how easily that carbocation forms.
| Alcohol | What you see | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 3° | Turbidity immediately, at room temperature | A tertiary carbocation is the most stable, so it forms at once (SN1) |
| 2° | Turbidity after about five minutes | A secondary carbocation is stable enough, but takes its time |
| 1° | No turbidity in the cold; you must heat it | A primary carbocation is far too unstable to form under these conditions |
Method 2 — oxidation. Warm each alcohol with acidified potassium dichromate. A 1° alcohol turns the orange solution green and yields first an aldehyde and then a carboxylic acid. A 2° alcohol also turns it green but stops at a ketone. A 3° alcohol leaves the solution stubbornly orange.
Method 3 — catalytic dehydrogenation over copper at 573 K. This is the cleanest discriminator of all because each class gives a chemically different kind of product: a 1° alcohol gives an aldehyde, a 2° alcohol gives a ketone, and a 3° alcohol does not dehydrogenate at all — it dehydrates instead, giving an alkene. Aldehyde, ketone, alkene: three different answers, no ambiguity.
The bonus test — iodoform. Warm the alcohol with iodine and sodium hydroxide. A yellow precipitate of iodoform, CHI3, appears only if the molecule contains the CH3–CH(OH)– unit, that is, a methyl group attached to the carbinol carbon which still carries a hydrogen. Ethanol, propan-2-ol and butan-2-ol are positive. Methanol and propan-1-ol are negative. 2-Methylpropan-2-ol is negative too, because its carbinol carbon has no hydrogen at all.
Answer. C = 2-methylpropan-2-ol (3°, instant turbidity). B = butan-2-ol (2°, about five minutes). A = butan-1-ol (1°, no turbidity in the cold).
Iodoform test: only B, butan-2-ol, gives the yellow precipitate, because only it contains the CH3–CH(OH)– grouping. Butan-1-ol has a –CH2OH end, and 2-methylpropan-2-ol has no hydrogen on its carbinol carbon.
Model answer. Pass the vapour of each alcohol over heated copper at 573 K.
Propan-1-ol (1°) loses two hydrogens from the carbinol carbon and its oxygen, giving propanal, which restores the pink colour of Schiff’s reagent.
Propan-2-ol (2°) gives propanone, a ketone that does not respond to Schiff’s reagent.
2-Methylpropan-2-ol (3°) has no hydrogen on the carbinol carbon, so it cannot be dehydrogenated; instead it loses water and gives the alkene 2-methylprop-1-ene.
Chemical Reactions of Phenols
Phenol has a split personality, and both halves come from the same resonance. The oxygen’s lone pair pushes into the ring. That makes the O–H more acidic (charge can leave the oxygen) and simultaneously makes the ring electron-rich (charge arrives at the ortho and para carbons). So phenol is an unusually good acid and an unusually eager partner for electrophiles. Every reaction below is one of those two things.
1. Acidity. Phenol dissolves in aqueous sodium hydroxide to give sodium phenoxide and water. It does not react with sodium hydrogencarbonate, so no carbon dioxide is evolved. That single negative result is what separates phenol from a carboxylic acid in every board question ever written on the topic.
2. Esterification (acylation). Phenol reacts with acetic anhydride, or with ethanoyl chloride in the presence of a base, to give phenyl ethanoate (phenyl acetate). Phenols are poorer nucleophiles than alcohols, which is why the more reactive anhydride or acid chloride is used rather than the carboxylic acid itself.
3. Electrophilic substitution. The –OH group is strongly activating and ortho, para-directing.
- Nitration. With dilute nitric acid at low temperature, phenol gives a mixture of 2-nitrophenol and 4-nitrophenol. The two are separated by steam distillation: the ortho isomer forms an intramolecular hydrogen bond (a private handshake inside its own molecule), so it does not cling to its neighbours and travels over with the steam; the para isomer forms intermolecular hydrogen bonds and stays behind. With concentrated nitric acid the reaction goes all the way to 2,4,6-trinitrophenol, picric acid.
- Halogenation. This one is a two-condition question. Phenol with bromine in a non-polar solvent such as carbon disulphide at 273 K gives mainly 4-bromophenol. Phenol with bromine water gives an immediate white precipitate of 2,4,6-tribromophenol. The difference is polarity: in water phenol ionises a little to phenoxide, which is even more activated, so all three positions are attacked at once.
4. Kolbe’s reaction. Sodium phenoxide is heated with carbon dioxide under pressure (about 400 K, 4–7 atm). Carbon dioxide is a weak electrophile, but phenoxide is a strong enough nucleophile to attack it. The product, after acidification, is 2-hydroxybenzoic acid — salicylic acid, the parent of aspirin.
5. Reimer–Tiemann reaction. Phenol is treated with chloroform and aqueous sodium hydroxide at about 340 K. The hydroxide strips a proton from chloroform to generate dichlorocarbene, :CCl2, which is the real electrophile. It attacks the ortho position, and hydrolysis of the resulting intermediate gives 2-hydroxybenzaldehyde — salicylaldehyde.
Kolbe: the carbon arrives as CO2 and leaves as –COOH. Carbon dioxide in, carboxylic acid out. K for Kolbe, K for the karboxyl.
Reimer–Tiemann: the carbon arrives as CHCl3 and leaves as –CHO. Chloroform in, aldehyde out — and notice the shape of the formula barely changes: CHCl3 → CHO, the three chlorines simply become one oxygen.
Both reactions attach the new carbon ortho to the –OH, because the phenoxide oxygen holds the incoming group close, like a host keeping a guest in the next seat.
6. Reaction with zinc dust. Distil phenol with zinc dust and the oxygen is stripped off altogether: you get benzene and zinc oxide. It is a neat way of walking a substituent back off the ring.
7. Oxidation. Phenol is oxidised by sodium dichromate in sulphuric acid to benzene-1,4-dione (para-benzoquinone), a bright conjugated diketone. Old phenol samples go pink for the same reason — slow air oxidation. If keeping track of what is being oxidised and what is being reduced still trips you up, the electron bookkeeping in our chapter on Electrochemistry is the cleanest place to rebuild that habit.
8. The ferric chloride test. Add neutral ferric chloride solution to phenol and a violet colouration appears, from a coloured iron–phenoxide complex. Alcohols give nothing. This is the fastest single test for a phenolic –OH on the bench.
Answer. (a) Sodium phenoxide + CO2 at about 400 K and 4–7 atm, followed by acidification with dilute acid, gives salicylic acid (2-hydroxybenzoic acid). (b) Phenol + CHCl3 + aqueous NaOH at about 340 K, followed by hydrolysis, gives salicylaldehyde (2-hydroxybenzaldehyde); the attacking species is dichlorocarbene, :CCl2.
Both products are ortho-substituted, and both are named after salix, the willow — a useful hook, since willow bark is where salicylates were first found.
Model answer. Dissolve the mixture in ether and shake it with aqueous sodium hydrogencarbonate. Benzoic acid, being above carbonic acid on the acidity ladder, reacts to give soluble sodium benzoate with brisk effervescence of CO2 and passes into the aqueous layer. Phenol, which sits below carbonic acid, does not react and stays in the ether layer. Separate the layers, then acidify the aqueous layer with dilute HCl to recover benzoic acid, and evaporate the ether to recover phenol.
The principle: a base only deprotonates an acid that is stronger than the base’s own conjugate acid. Choosing the right rung of the ladder is the separation.
Answer. (a) Mainly 4-bromophenol, with a little of the 2-isomer; the non-polar solvent keeps the reaction gentle and mono-substitution results. (b) 2,4,6-Tribromophenol, as an immediate white precipitate. In water, phenol partly ionises to phenoxide, which is a far more strongly activated ring, so all three available ortho and para positions are brominated at once.
This white precipitate is also a useful confirmatory test for phenol.
Preparation of Ethers
Two methods, and one of them comes with a design trap that examiners set almost every year.
(a) Dehydration of alcohols. Heat an alcohol with concentrated sulphuric acid at about 413 K and two molecules join with the loss of water: 2 R–OH → R–O–R + H2O. This is nucleophilic substitution — a second alcohol molecule attacks the protonated first one — and because it is essentially an SN2 process it works well only for primary alcohols. Secondary and tertiary alcohols eliminate instead and hand you an alkene. It also only ever gives symmetrical ethers, since there is just one alcohol in the flask.
(b) Williamson synthesis. An alkoxide (or a phenoxide) attacks an alkyl halide: R–O−Na+ + R′–X → R–O–R′ + NaX. This is a clean SN2 reaction and it is the general method — it will build symmetrical and unsymmetrical ethers, and alkyl aryl ethers too.
Answer. Choose sodium tert-butoxide, (CH3)3C–O−Na+, with iodomethane (or bromomethane). The halide carbon is a methyl group — completely unhindered — so SN2 proceeds smoothly and the ether is formed.
The other pair, sodium methoxide with 2-bromo-2-methylpropane, fails. The halide carbon is tertiary and hopelessly crowded, so the methoxide ion acts as a base rather than a nucleophile, pulls off a β-hydrogen, and the product is the alkene 2-methylprop-1-ene, not the ether.
Answer. Treat sodium phenoxide with iodomethane. The phenoxide oxygen is the nucleophile and the methyl carbon is the SN2 target, so the ether forms readily.
Bromobenzene is useless because its C–Br carbon is sp2 and part of the aromatic ring; the C–Br bond has partial double-bond character and the ring’s electron cloud repels an approaching nucleophile. Aryl halides simply do not undergo SN2. This is the same unreactivity you met in the haloarenes section of the previous chapter.
Rule of thumb: in a Williamson synthesis the aryl group must arrive on the oxygen side, never on the halide side.
Answer. (a) Ethoxyethane is symmetrical and derived from a primary alcohol, so either method works — simplest is to heat ethanol with concentrated H2SO4 at 413 K. (b) Methoxyethane is unsymmetrical, so dehydration cannot make it; use the Williamson synthesis. Either sodium ethoxide with iodomethane, or sodium methoxide with bromoethane, will do, since both halides are unhindered.
Properties and Reactions of Ethers
An ether has no O–H, so it is chemically quiet: it does not react with sodium, it is not acidic, and it will happily sit in a flask as a solvent while more dramatic chemistry happens around it. That is precisely why diethyl ether is the traditional Grignard solvent. But the ether oxygen still has lone pairs, and under acidic conditions those lone pairs are its weak point.
1. Cleavage of the C–O bond by hydrogen halides. Heat an ether with a hydrogen halide and it splits. Reactivity of the acid is HI > HBr > HCl. The oxygen is protonated first, then a halide ion attacks a carbon. Which carbon it attacks is the whole question.
- Both groups primary or secondary → SN2. The iodide attacks the less hindered carbon. So methoxyethane + HI gives iodomethane + ethanol. With excess HI and heat, the ethanol goes on to become iodoethane.
- One group tertiary → SN1. A stable tertiary carbocation forms, so the halide bonds to the tertiary carbon. So 2-methoxy-2-methylpropane + HI gives 2-iodo-2-methylpropane + methanol.
- Alkyl aryl ethers → always phenol + alkyl halide. The C(aryl)–O bond has partial double-bond character and its carbon is sp2, so it is never attacked. Anisole + HI gives phenol + iodomethane, never iodobenzene and methanol.
2. Electrophilic substitution on aromatic ethers. In an alkyl aryl ether the –OR group behaves like –OH: it pushes electron density into the ring, so it is activating and ortho, para-directing. Because the methoxy group is bulky, the para product usually dominates.
| Reaction on anisole | Reagents | Major product |
|---|---|---|
| Bromination | Br2 in ethanoic acid (no Lewis-acid catalyst needed) | 4-Bromoanisole, with a little of the 2-isomer |
| Nitration | conc. HNO3 + conc. H2SO4 | 2-Nitroanisole and 4-nitroanisole |
| Friedel–Crafts alkylation | CH3Cl, anhydrous AlCl3 | 4-Methylanisole (with some 2-isomer) |
| Friedel–Crafts acylation | CH3COCl, anhydrous AlCl3 | 4-Methoxyacetophenone (para major) |
Answer. (a) Both groups are unhindered, so SN2 operates and iodide attacks the smaller carbon: CH3I + CH3CH2OH. (b) A tertiary carbocation is available, so the SN1 route wins and iodide bonds to the tertiary carbon: (CH3)3CI + CH3OH. (c) The aryl–oxygen bond cannot be broken, so the methyl side goes: C6H5OH + CH3I.
Three ethers, three different rules — check the carbons before you write anything.
Answer. The methoxy group donates a lone pair into the ring by resonance, building up electron density at the ortho and para carbons. The ring is therefore strongly activated and can polarise a bromine molecule by itself, so no Lewis acid is required to generate the electrophile. Substitution occurs at the ortho and para positions, and because the methoxy group is bulky it blocks the two ortho positions sterically, so the para product predominates.
Some Commercially Important Alcohols
The syllabus names this section explicitly, and it is genuinely easy marks — two molecules, a handful of facts each.
Methanol, CH3OH. Historically it was made by the destructive distillation of wood, which is why it is still called wood spirit. Industrially it is produced by passing carbon monoxide and hydrogen over a zinc oxide–chromium oxide catalyst at high temperature and pressure. It is used as a solvent, as an antifreeze, and as the raw material for methanal. It is also seriously poisonous: ingesting even small quantities causes blindness, and larger amounts are fatal. This is exactly why industrial ethanol is deliberately contaminated with methanol.
Ethanol, C2H5OH. Made industrially by the fermentation of sugars. The enzyme invertase in yeast first splits sucrose into glucose and fructose; the enzyme zymase then converts those sugars into ethanol and carbon dioxide. Ethanol is a solvent, a fuel additive, an antiseptic in dilute solution, and a starting material for a long list of chemicals.
- Denatured or methylated spirit — ethanol made undrinkable by adding methanol together with a dye such as copper sulphate and a little pyridine, so that it can be sold cheaply for industrial use without attracting excise duty.
- Absolute alcohol — ethanol from which essentially all the water has been removed.
- Power alcohol — ethanol blended with petrol as a fuel.
Model answer.
Methanol — source: destructive distillation of wood historically, and industrially from carbon monoxide and hydrogen over a ZnO–Cr2O3 catalyst. Use: solvent and antifreeze, and the feedstock for methanal. Hazard: highly toxic; it attacks the optic nerve and causes blindness, and can be fatal.
Ethanol — source: fermentation of sugars by yeast enzymes (invertase then zymase). Use: solvent, antiseptic, and blended with petrol as power alcohol. Hazard: a central nervous system depressant; chronic consumption damages the liver.
The examiner is looking for the word fermentation and the words invertase and zymase.
The Lab-Bench Identification Decision Flow
This is where the whole chapter earns its keep. Imagine a labelled-only-as-“X” bottle containing a colourless liquid known to hold nothing but carbon, hydrogen and oxygen. Four tests, run in this order, will name it. Run them in the wrong order and you will waste reagent and confuse yourself, so the order matters.
- Sodium metal. Drop in a small clean piece. Bubbles of hydrogen mean an acidic O–H is present, so X is an alcohol, a phenol or a carboxylic acid. No bubbles is already an answer: X is an ether.
- Neutral ferric chloride. A violet, blue or green colouration means a phenol. Confirm by shaking with sodium hydroxide solution (phenol dissolves) and with bromine water (a white precipitate of 2,4,6-tribromophenol appears).
- Lucas reagent. Now that X is known to be an alcohol, this sorts the class. Cloudiness at once means 3°; cloudiness after about five minutes means 2°; a clear solution in the cold means 1°.
- Iodine and sodium hydroxide, warmed. A yellow precipitate of iodoform pins down the exact skeleton: X contains the CH3–CH(OH)– unit. This is what separates ethanol from methanol, and butan-2-ol from butan-1-ol.
If at step 1 you also want to exclude a carboxylic acid, slip in a fifth bottle: sodium hydrogencarbonate. Brisk effervescence of carbon dioxide means a carboxylic acid, and nothing else in this chapter does that. On the acidity ladder you are simply asking whether X stands above or below carbonic acid.
Answer.
The degree of unsaturation of C3H8O is (2×3 + 2 − 8) ÷ 2 = 0, so X is fully saturated and acyclic.
Sodium test positive → an O–H group is present, so X is an alcohol, not an ether.
FeCl3 negative → not a phenol (and with only three carbons it could not be one anyway).
Lucas cloudiness in about five minutes → a secondary alcohol.
Iodoform positive → the CH3–CH(OH)– unit is present.
The only C3H8O structure satisfying all four is propan-2-ol, CH3CH(OH)CH3. Its isomer propan-1-ol would have failed both the Lucas timing and the iodoform test, and methoxyethane would have failed the sodium test at step one.
Answer. No reaction with sodium means no O–H, so Y is an ether. With the formula C4H10O and one fragment being a methyl group, the other fragment must be C3H7. Since the second iodide is a propyl iodide, Y is either 1-methoxypropane or 2-methoxypropane. If the second product is 2-iodopropane then Y is 2-methoxypropane, CH3–O–CH(CH3)2.
With one equivalent of HI the iodide attacks the less hindered methyl carbon, giving iodomethane and propan-2-ol; with excess HI the propan-2-ol is converted onward to 2-iodopropane.
Alcohols, Phenols and Ethers Class 12 Chemistry Important Questions — the Reaction and Reagent List
Almost every Alcohols, Phenols and Ethers formula and reaction list question, and most of the NCERT intext exercises, reduces to recognising a reagent. Here is the whole chapter as reagent-in, product-out. Cover the right-hand column and test yourself; when you can fill it in from memory you are ready for the paper.
| Starting material | Reagent and conditions | Product |
|---|---|---|
| Alkene | dil. H2SO4 / H2O | Alcohol, Markovnikov |
| Alkene | B2H6, then H2O2/OH− | Alcohol, anti-Markovnikov |
| Aldehyde | NaBH4 or LiAlH4 or H2/Ni | 1° alcohol |
| Ketone | NaBH4 or LiAlH4 or H2/Ni | 2° alcohol |
| Carboxylic acid | LiAlH4 | 1° alcohol |
| RMgX + HCHO | then H3O+ | 1° alcohol |
| RMgX + ketone | then H3O+ | 3° alcohol |
| Chlorobenzene | NaOH, 623 K, 300 atm, then H+ | Phenol |
| Benzenesulphonic acid | NaOH fusion, then H+ | Phenol |
| Benzenediazonium chloride | warm water | Phenol + N2 |
| Cumene | O2, then dil. acid | Phenol + propanone |
| Alcohol | Na metal | Sodium alkoxide + H2 |
| Alcohol + carboxylic acid | conc. H2SO4, warm | Ester + water |
| Alcohol | SOCl2 (pyridine) | Alkyl chloride + SO2 + HCl |
| Ethanol | conc. H2SO4, 413 K | Ethoxyethane |
| Ethanol | conc. H2SO4, 443 K | Ethene |
| 1° alcohol | PCC / CH2Cl2 | Aldehyde |
| 1° alcohol | acidified KMnO4 or K2Cr2O7 | Carboxylic acid |
| 2° alcohol | Cu, 573 K | Ketone |
| 3° alcohol | Cu, 573 K | Alkene (dehydration) |
| Phenol | aq. NaOH | Sodium phenoxide (dissolves) |
| Phenol | Br2 in CS2, 273 K | 4-Bromophenol |
| Phenol | bromine water | 2,4,6-Tribromophenol, white ppt. |
| Phenol | conc. HNO3 | 2,4,6-Trinitrophenol (picric acid) |
| Sodium phenoxide | CO2, 400 K, 4–7 atm, then H+ | Salicylic acid (Kolbe) |
| Phenol | CHCl3 + aq. NaOH, 340 K | Salicylaldehyde (Reimer–Tiemann) |
| Phenol | Zn dust, distil | Benzene + ZnO |
| Phenol | Na2Cr2O7 / H2SO4 | Benzene-1,4-dione |
| Phenol | neutral FeCl3 | Violet colouration (test) |
| Sodium alkoxide + 1° alkyl halide | SN2 | Ether (Williamson) |
| CH3OC2H5 | HI | CH3I + C2H5OH |
| Anisole | HI | Phenol + CH3I |
| Anisole | Br2 in CH3COOH | 4-Bromoanisole |
Practice Worksheet
Ten questions, written for this page and not lifted from anywhere. Do them with the notes closed, then open each answer. If you get one wrong, go back to the section it came from rather than simply reading the solution again.
Q1. Give the IUPAC name of (CH3)3C–OH and classify it. Would it respond to the iodoform test?
It would not give the iodoform test. That test needs a CH3–CH(OH)– grouping, and here the carbinol carbon has no hydrogen at all.
Q2. Arrange in increasing order of acid strength and justify: ethanol, water, phenol, 4-nitrophenol, ethanoic acid.
Ethanol is weakest: the ethoxide ion carries the whole charge on one oxygen and the ethyl group’s +I effect makes that worse. Water is a little stronger, since hydroxide has no electron-releasing alkyl group. Phenol is much stronger because the phenoxide ion delocalises the charge into the ring. 4-Nitrophenol is stronger still, as the para nitro group withdraws electrons by resonance and induction. Ethanoic acid tops the list because the carboxylate ion spreads the charge equally over two identical oxygen atoms.
Q3. Predict the major organic product when but-1-ene is treated with (a) dilute H2SO4, (b) B2H6 followed by H2O2/OH−. Name the rule that governs each.
(b) Butan-1-ol. Boron attaches to the less substituted terminal carbon and is replaced by –OH on oxidation — an anti-Markovnikov (hydroboration–oxidation) outcome, with no carbocation and therefore no rearrangement.
Q4. Why is 2-nitrophenol steam-volatile while 4-nitrophenol is not?
In 4-nitrophenol the two groups are on opposite sides of the ring and cannot reach each other, so the molecules form intermolecular hydrogen bonds with one another instead. These hold the molecules together, raise the boiling point and leave the compound behind in the flask. This difference is exactly how the two nitration products are separated.
Q5. Write the reagents and conditions to convert phenol into (a) salicylaldehyde, (b) salicylic acid, (c) picric acid, (d) benzene.
(b) Salicylic acid: convert phenol to sodium phenoxide with NaOH, heat with CO2 at about 400 K and 4–7 atm, then acidify — Kolbe’s reaction.
(c) Picric acid (2,4,6-trinitrophenol): treat with concentrated nitric acid.
(d) Benzene: distil phenol with zinc dust; zinc oxide is the other product.
Q6. Compound Y has the formula C4H10O. It does not react with sodium metal. On heating with excess HI it gives iodomethane and 2-iodopropane. Identify Y and explain the outcome.
The degree of unsaturation is (2×4 + 2 − 10) ÷ 2 = 0, so Y is saturated and acyclic. No reaction with sodium rules out an O–H, so Y must be an ether. The two iodides identify the two fragments as methyl and isopropyl.
With the first equivalent of HI, the protonated ether is attacked by iodide at the less hindered methyl carbon (SN2), giving iodomethane and propan-2-ol. The excess HI then converts the propan-2-ol into 2-iodopropane.
Q7. Of butan-1-ol, butan-2-ol and 2-methylpropan-2-ol, which reacts fastest with Lucas reagent, and which gives a positive iodoform test? Explain both answers.
Positive iodoform: butan-2-ol only. It is the only one of the three containing the CH3–CH(OH)– unit. Butan-1-ol ends in –CH2OH, and 2-methylpropan-2-ol has no hydrogen on the carbinol carbon.
Q8. Complete: propan-1-ol, propan-2-ol and 2-methylpropan-2-ol are each passed over copper at 573 K. Name the three products and explain why the third is different in kind.
Dehydrogenation removes one hydrogen from the oxygen and one from the carbinol carbon. A primary alcohol has two hydrogens on that carbon and gives an aldehyde; a secondary alcohol has one and gives a ketone. A tertiary alcohol has none, so dehydrogenation is impossible; the hot copper instead brings about dehydration, and an alkene is formed.
Q9. 0.92 g of a monohydric alcohol liberates 224 cm3 of hydrogen at STP on treatment with excess sodium. Identify the alcohol, showing your working.
Moles of H2 = 0.224 L ÷ 22.4 L mol−1 = 0.0100 mol.
Moles of alcohol = 2 × 0.0100 = 0.0200 mol.
Molar mass = 0.92 g ÷ 0.0200 mol = 46 g mol−1.
C2H5OH has M = 46.07 g mol−1, so the alcohol is ethanol. (Methanol, at 32 g mol−1, would have released 322 cm3; propan-1-ol, at 60 g mol−1, only 172 cm3.)
Q10. Explain why the Williamson synthesis of 2-ethoxy-2-methylpropane succeeds from sodium tert-butoxide and bromoethane, but fails from sodium ethoxide and 2-bromo-2-methylpropane.
With sodium tert-butoxide and bromoethane, the halide carbon is primary and easily approached, so substitution occurs and the ether is formed.
With sodium ethoxide and 2-bromo-2-methylpropane, the halide carbon is tertiary and completely shielded by three methyl groups. The ethoxide ion cannot reach it, so it behaves as a base instead, abstracts a β-hydrogen, and elimination gives 2-methylprop-1-ene. Bulk must therefore be carried by the alkoxide, never by the halide.
One Last Thing
You will not master this chapter in an evening, and you are not supposed to. Tomorrow, come back and try to draw the acidity ladder from memory before you read anything. The day after, write the reagent table with the right-hand column covered. Small, boring, daily gains are what separate a 6 from a 3 in this unit — not a heroic all-nighter. Get one more reaction right today than you did yesterday, and let that be enough.

