★ India’s Student Guidance Platform

Accounting for Partnership Firms: Fundamentals — Class 12 Accountancy Notes & Practice

Accounting for Partnership Firms: Fundamentals — Class 12 Accountancy Notes & Practice

Take a breath. If the words “partnership firm” make you picture a wall of ledger columns and a teacher moving very fast, you are in good company. Almost every Class 12 student meets this chapter and feels the floor tilt a little. Here is the reassuring truth: Accounting for Partnership Firms: Fundamentals is not really about accounting at first. It is about fairness between friends. Two or three people put money and effort into one business, the business earns something, and somebody has to decide who gets what. Every rule, every account, every strange-looking format in this chapter exists only to answer that one human question honestly. We will build the whole thing from zero, in plain language, with every rupee figure worked out in front of you. The topic map here follows the NCERT Accountancy Part 1 textbook (2025 reprint of the rationalised edition), which is the book your board paper is written from.

By the time you reach the bottom of this page you will be able to open a blank sheet, look at any of the accounting for partnership firms fundamentals class 12 important questions, and know exactly which account to draw first. We will cover the profit and loss appropriation account format class 12 line by line through 18 computed and re-checked core examples, followed by an 11-question self-assessment worksheet.

Meet Your Tutor

Partnership accounting becomes much easier once every adjustment has a clear home. I will work beside you through the deed, capital accounts, appropriation, interest, guarantee and past-adjustment logic, pausing at each calculation so you can see not just what to write, but why the entry belongs there.

What You’ll Learn

🎯 Try This
Invent a two-person business with a friend or with an imaginary partner — a weekend cycle-repair stall, a home bakery, a tuition centre, anything. On one page, write a short partnership deed for it. Decide and write down seven things: (1) the name of the firm and what it does, (2) how much money each of you puts in, (3) the profit-sharing ratio and why that ratio is fair, (4) whether interest on capital will be allowed and at what rate, (5) whether either partner gets a monthly salary for doing more of the daily work, (6) how much each partner may withdraw per month and whether interest on drawings will be charged, and (7) what happens if the business makes a loss. Now argue with yourself: if your partner put in three times your money but you do all the work, is your ratio still fair? Change one clause and note what it does to the numbers. This single page will teach you more about why the appropriation account exists than any definition can. (15-20 min)

Your Game Plan

Work through the chapter in this order. Each step rests on the one before it, so please resist the urge to jump ahead to the big formats.

  1. Understand what makes a group of people a partnership in law, not just in friendship.
  2. Learn what a partnership deed contains, and what the Act does for you when there is no deed.
  3. Get completely comfortable with the two ways of keeping capital accounts.
  4. Learn the Profit and Loss Appropriation Account as a story, not a format to memorise.
  5. Master the three arithmetic engines: interest on capital, interest on drawings, salary and commission.
  6. Handle the two special cases boards love: guarantee of minimum profit, and past adjustments.
  7. Finish with the worksheet at the end, writing full working, not just answers.
🔑 Key Rule — The Tiffin Rule
Here is the one idea that unlocks the whole chapter. Imagine four friends buy one large tiffin to share. The shopkeeper’s bill must be paid before anyone opens the box — that payment is a charge. How the food inside is then divided among the four is an appropriation. In a partnership firm, rent, wages to employees and interest on a partner’s loan are charges — they are subtracted before profit even exists. Interest on capital, partners’ salary, partners’ commission and share of profit are appropriations — they are only ways of dividing a profit that already exists. Charges go to the Profit and Loss Account. Appropriations go to the Profit and Loss Appropriation Account. Get this one distinction right and half your mistakes disappear.

Study Notes

Partnership: Meaning and Features

A partnership (साझेदारी) is the relation between persons who have agreed to share the profits of a business carried on by all, or by any one of them acting for all. That sentence is from Section 4 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, and every phrase in it is doing work. Read it slowly with me.

“Persons who have agreed” — there must be an agreement. Two brothers who inherit a shop from their father are co-owners, but they are not partners until they agree to run it together. “Business” — there must be an actual trade or profession, not merely joint ownership of a flat. “Share the profits” — profit sharing is the giveaway sign. And “carried on by all, or by any one of them acting for all” — this is the phrase students always skip, and it is the most important one. It means mutual agency: each partner is both an owner and an agent of the firm. When one partner signs a supply contract, all the partners are bound by it. That is why partnership is a relationship built on trust rather than paperwork alone.

The features that follow from this definition are worth listing carefully, because one-mark questions come straight from them.

  • Two or more persons — a minimum of two. Section 464 of the Companies Act, 2013 sets a statutory ceiling of 100, while Rule 10 of the Companies (Miscellaneous) Rules, 2014 currently prescribes a maximum of 50 persons for a partnership formed to carry on a business.
  • Agreement — written or oral, but an agreement all the same. Partnership arises from contract, not from status.
  • Lawful business — the object must be legal, and it must be a business.
  • Profit sharing — profits (and by implication losses) are shared in an agreed ratio.
  • Mutual agency — the true test. Every partner can bind the firm.
  • Unlimited liability — if the firm’s assets fall short, partners pay from personal assets, jointly and severally.
  • No separate legal entity — in law the firm is simply the partners collectively, which is exactly why a partner’s loan to the firm is treated differently from capital.
Example 1 — Is this a partnership?
Neha and Farhan jointly own a shop building they inherited. They rent it out and split the rent of ₹1,20,000 a year equally — ₹60,000 each. Are they partners?

Working: Apply the four tests. Agreement to run a business together — no, they only inherited property. Business — no, letting out inherited property is not a business being carried on. Sharing of profits — they share income, but income from co-owned property is not business profit. Mutual agency — Neha cannot bind Farhan to a supply contract.

Answer: They are co-owners, not partners. Now change one fact: suppose they agree to convert the ground floor into a stationery shop, put in ₹2,00,000 each, and share profits equally. Every test is now satisfied, and from that date they are partners.

Why it works: The examiner is testing whether you can spot mutual agency. Sharing money alone is never enough — a manager paid a share of profits as a bonus is still an employee, because he cannot bind the firm.

Partnership Deed and Its Contents

A partnership deed (साझेदारी विलेख) is the written agreement among the partners. The law does not force you to have one. But going into business without a deed is like playing a match where nobody wrote down the rules and everyone remembers them differently the moment there is a dispute. The deed is written on the calm day so that it can speak on the difficult day.

A well-drafted deed usually covers: the name of the firm and the nature of business; the date of commencement and duration; the capital each partner contributes; the profit-sharing ratio; whether interest on capital is allowed and at what rate; whether interest on drawings is charged and how it is computed; salary or commission to any partner; the rights and duties of each partner; how accounts are to be kept and audited; the treatment of goodwill on admission, retirement or death; the procedure for admitting a new partner; and how disputes will be settled, usually by arbitration.

Example 2 — What one clause is worth
Ritu and Sameer earn a profit of ₹3,00,000. Ritu contributed most of the capital and insists the ratio should be 3:2 in her favour. Sameer says nothing was ever written down. Show the difference the clause makes.

With a deed saying 3:2: Ritu = ₹3,00,000 × 3/5 = ₹1,80,000; Sameer = ₹3,00,000 × 2/5 = ₹1,20,000. Check: 1,80,000 + 1,20,000 = 3,00,000. ✓

With no deed: the Act forces an equal split — ₹1,50,000 each.

Answer: That single missing line costs Ritu ₹30,000 in one year.

Why it works: The Act never asks who contributed more capital. In the absence of agreement it treats partners as equals, full stop. This is exactly why deeds get written.
💡 Exam Tip
If a question asks for “any four contents of a partnership deed”, do not list vague things like “rules of the firm”. Name specific clauses — profit-sharing ratio, rate of interest on capital, partner’s salary, treatment of goodwill. Specific clauses score; general phrases do not.

Rules When There Is No Partnership Deed (Indian Partnership Act, 1932)

Is there a Partnership Deed? YES NO Follow the Deed Apply Indian Partnership Act, 1932 — default rules Every clause is binding on all 1. Profits and losses shared EQUALLY 2. NO interest on capital 3. NO salary or commission to a partner 4. Loan by a partner earns 6% p.a.
When the deed is silent, these four defaults switch on automatically.

When there is no deed at all, or the deed exists but is silent on a point, the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 quietly fills the gap. Four defaults matter for your exam, and they are shown in the flowchart above.

  • Profits and losses are shared equally, no matter how unequal the capitals are.
  • No interest on capital is allowed to any partner.
  • No salary or commission is payable to any partner for extra work.
  • Interest on a loan given by a partner to the firm is allowed at 6% per annum, and it is a charge against profit, so it is paid even if the firm makes a loss.
🔑 Key Rule
Notice the odd one out. Three defaults say “no”. The fourth says “yes, 6%”. That is deliberate: capital is ownership money and carries risk, so the Act gives it no guaranteed return. A loan is lending money, quite separate from ownership, so the Act protects it. This is also why Partner’s Loan A/c is shown as a liability of the firm, never inside the Capital Account.
Example 3 — No deed, with a partner’s loan
Rahul and Simran started a firm with capitals of ₹6,00,000 and ₹2,00,000. There is no partnership deed. On 1 October 2025 Simran gave the firm a loan of ₹1,00,000. Profit for the year ended 31 March 2026, before allowing interest on the loan, was ₹2,45,000. Distribute the profit.

Step 1 — interest on Simran’s loan (a charge). The loan ran from 1 October to 31 March, which is 6 months.
Interest = ₹1,00,000 × 6/100 × 6/12 = ₹3,000.

Step 2 — find the divisible profit. ₹2,45,000 − ₹3,000 = ₹2,42,000.

Step 3 — divide it. No deed, so the split is equal, not 6:2.
Rahul = ₹2,42,000 ÷ 2 = ₹1,21,000; Simran = ₹1,21,000. Check: 1,21,000 + 1,21,000 = 2,42,000. ✓

Simran also receives ₹3,000 as loan interest, credited to her Loan A/c, not to her share of profit.

Why it works: The ₹3,000 is deducted before profit is divided because it is a charge — the shopkeeper’s bill in the Tiffin Rule. The equal division then follows because the Act refuses to look at capital sizes.
Example 4 — Three claims, three answers
Ayesha and Vikram are partners with no deed. At the year end three disputes arise. Settle each one with the Act.

Claim 1 — Ayesha wants 10% interest on her capital of ₹5,00,000, that is ₹50,000. Rejected. In the absence of a deed no interest on capital is allowed. She gets ₹0.

Claim 2 — Vikram wants a salary of ₹10,000 a month because he manages the shop daily. Rejected. No salary is payable to a partner unless the deed says so. He gets ₹0. His extra effort is legally treated as an ordinary duty of a partner.

Claim 3 — Vikram lent the firm ₹2,00,000 for the full year and wants 12% interest, that is ₹24,000. Partly allowed. The Act fixes the rate at 6%.
Interest = ₹2,00,000 × 6/100 × 12/12 = ₹12,000.

Why it works: Two rejections and one partial allowance in one question is a classic three-mark board pattern. The examiner wants to see that you know the Act allows a rate, not a demand.
⚠️ Common Mistake
Students see capitals of ₹6,00,000 and ₹2,00,000 and instinctively divide profit 3:1. Unequal capital never creates an unequal profit ratio by itself. Unless the deed fixes a ratio, the split is equal. Write “no deed, therefore equal” in the margin before you touch the calculator.

Fixed and Fluctuating Capital Accounts

Every partner’s money in the firm has two very different parts: the lump sum they originally committed, and the running stream of small credits and debits — interest, salary, share of profit, drawings. A firm must choose how to record these two parts, and there are exactly two choices.

Under the fluctuating capital method, everything goes into one account. The capital balance changes every single year, which is why it is called fluctuating. Under the fixed capital method, two accounts are kept for each partner: a Capital Account that holds only the original amount and any fresh capital brought in or permanently withdrawn, and a Current Account that absorbs everything else. The capital figure then sits still, year after year, like the foundation of a house, while the current account is the busy front room.

Point of differenceFixed Capital MethodFluctuating Capital Method
Number of accountsTwo — Capital A/c and Current A/cOne — Capital A/c only
Change in capital balanceStays the same unless fresh capital is brought in or withdrawnChanges every year
Where interest on capital, salary, profit and drawings goCurrent AccountCapital Account
Can the balance be a debit balance?Capital A/c is always credit; Current A/c may be debitCapital A/c itself may show a debit balance
Shown in the Balance SheetCapital and Current shown separatelyOne combined figure
Mention needed in the deedMust be specifically agreedApplies by default when nothing is said
🔑 Key Rule
If a question does not tell you which method to use, use the fluctuating method. The fixed method has to be specifically chosen; the fluctuating method is the default. And under the fixed method, never let a drawing or a salary touch the Capital Account — that single slip costs marks in almost every board paper.

The next two examples use exactly the same facts, so you can see both methods side by side and watch where each rupee lands.

Example 5 — Fixed capital method
Aarav and Bhavna are partners sharing profits 3:2. Their capitals on 1 April 2025 were ₹5,00,000 and ₹3,00,000, kept on the fixed capital method. The deed allows interest on capital at 8% per annum and a salary of ₹10,000 per month to Aarav. Drawings during the year were Aarav ₹60,000 and Bhavna ₹40,000. Profit for the year was ₹4,00,000. Prepare the Capital and Current Accounts.

Step 1 — interest on capital.
Aarav = 5,00,000 × 8% = ₹40,000. Bhavna = 3,00,000 × 8% = ₹24,000. Total ₹64,000.
Step 2 — salary. ₹10,000 × 12 = ₹1,20,000 to Aarav.
Step 3 — profit left to share.
4,00,000 − (64,000 + 1,20,000) = 4,00,000 − 1,84,000 = ₹2,16,000.
Aarav = 2,16,000 × 3/5 = ₹1,29,600. Bhavna = 2,16,000 × 2/5 = ₹86,400. Check: 1,29,600 + 86,400 = 2,16,000. ✓
Step 4 — Current Accounts.
Aarav: 40,000 + 1,20,000 + 1,29,600 = 2,89,600, less drawings 60,000 = ₹2,29,600 credit.
Bhavna: 24,000 + 86,400 = 1,10,400, less drawings 40,000 = ₹70,400 credit.
Step 5 — Capital Accounts. Untouched: Aarav ₹5,00,000, Bhavna ₹3,00,000.

Why it works: Not one rupee of interest, salary, profit or drawings entered the Capital Account. That is the whole point of the fixed method — the owner’s committed stake is quarantined from the year’s traffic.
Partners’ Current Accounts (Example 5)
Dr. ParticularsAarav (₹)Bhavna (₹)Cr. ParticularsAarav (₹)Bhavna (₹)
To Drawings60,00040,000By Interest on Capital40,00024,000
To Balance c/d2,29,60070,400By Salary1,20,000—
By Profit and Loss Appropriation A/c1,29,60086,400
Total2,89,6001,10,400Total2,89,6001,10,400
Example 6 — The same firm on the fluctuating method
Take every figure from Example 5 unchanged, but assume the firm keeps fluctuating capitals. Find the closing capitals.

No Current Account exists, so everything lands in the Capital Account.

Aarav: 5,00,000 + 40,000 (interest) + 1,20,000 (salary) + 1,29,600 (profit) − 60,000 (drawings) = ₹7,29,600.
Cross-check: 5,00,000 + 2,29,600 (the current account balance from Example 5) = 7,29,600. ✓

Bhavna: 3,00,000 + 24,000 + 86,400 − 40,000 = ₹3,70,400.
Cross-check: 3,00,000 + 70,400 = 3,70,400. ✓

Why it works: The two methods never change how much a partner is owed — only how the total is displayed. Under the fixed method the total sits in two boxes; under the fluctuating method it sits in one. That cross-check is a free way to verify your answer in the exam.
💡 Exam Tip
Under the fixed method, if a partner’s drawings exceed everything credited to him, his Current Account shows a debit balance. Do not panic and do not force it to the credit side. Show it on the assets side of the Balance Sheet as “Current A/c of X (Dr.)”.

Profit and Loss Appropriation Account Format Class 12

Net Profit (from P&L A/c) P&L Appropriation A/c Interest onCapital Partner’sSalary Partner’sCommission Transfer toReserve Share of Profit (in ratio) Partners’ Capital / Current A/cs
One rupee of net profit, followed all the way to the partners’ accounts.

The Profit and Loss Appropriation Account is simply the room where profit gets divided. It is not a trading account and it never decides how much the firm earned — that was already settled in the Profit and Loss Account. The appropriation account only decides who gets it.

The credit side receives what is coming in: net profit brought down, and interest charged on partners’ drawings, which is money flowing back to the firm. The debit side records what goes out to the partners: interest on capital, salary, commission, any transfer to a general reserve, and finally the balancing share of profit. Once you can see the diagram above in your head, the format writes itself.

🔑 Key Rule — “I Serve Real Shares”
Use this sentence to remember the order of the debit side, top to bottom: Interest on capital, Salary and commission, Reserve, Share of profit. “I Serve Real Shares.” Write those four words down the left margin of your answer sheet before you begin, and you will never leave out the reserve transfer or put the share of profit above the salary.
Example 7 — A complete appropriation account
Meera and Nikhil share profits 3:2. Their capitals are ₹4,00,000 and ₹6,00,000. The deed allows interest on capital at 6% per annum and a salary of ₹5,000 per month to Nikhil. Interest charged on drawings was Meera ₹3,000 and Nikhil ₹2,000. Net profit for the year ended 31 March 2026 was ₹3,50,000. Prepare the Profit and Loss Appropriation Account.

Step 1 — interest on capital. Meera = 4,00,000 × 6% = ₹24,000. Nikhil = 6,00,000 × 6% = ₹36,000. Total ₹60,000.
Step 2 — salary. ₹5,000 × 12 = ₹60,000 to Nikhil.
Step 3 — total the credit side. 3,50,000 + 3,000 + 2,000 = ₹3,55,000.
Step 4 — profit left to share. 3,55,000 − (60,000 + 60,000) = ₹2,35,000.
Meera = 2,35,000 × 3/5 = ₹1,41,000. Nikhil = 2,35,000 × 2/5 = ₹94,000.
Step 5 — prove the account balances. Debit side = 60,000 + 60,000 + 1,41,000 + 94,000 = ₹3,55,000, which equals the credit side. ✓

Why it works: Interest on drawings sits on the credit side because it increases the pool available for division. Students who put it on the debit side end up with a difference of exactly twice the interest — a useful clue when your account will not balance.
Profit and Loss Appropriation Account for the year ended 31 March 2026 (Example 7)
Dr. ParticularsAmount (₹)Cr. ParticularsAmount (₹)
To Interest on Capital — Meera 24,000; Nikhil 36,00060,000By Profit and Loss A/c (net profit)3,50,000
To Salary — Nikhil60,000By Interest on Drawings — Meera3,000
To Profit transferred: Meera 1,41,0001,41,000By Interest on Drawings — Nikhil2,000
To Profit transferred: Nikhil 94,00094,000
Total3,55,000Total3,55,000
⚠️ Common Mistake
Rent paid to a partner for using his building, and interest on a partner’s loan, are charges. They belong in the Profit and Loss Account, above the net profit line — never in the appropriation account. If you drop them into the appropriation account, the net profit you start with is already wrong.

Once this account is second nature, the harder chapters open up easily. The same appropriation logic reappears when a new partner joins — see our walkthrough of how profit is shared on the admission of a partner — and again in goodwill and change in profit-sharing ratio.

Interest on Capital, Including When Profits Fall Short

Interest on capital is the firm’s way of saying thank you to the money, separately from thanking the effort. A partner who brings in ₹10,00,000 has given up whatever that money could have earned elsewhere, so many deeds allow a fixed percentage on capital before the remaining profit is divided by the ratio.

Three practical points decide almost every question on this topic. First, interest is calculated on the opening capital, plus a time-proportionate amount on any capital introduced during the year, minus a time-proportionate amount on any capital permanently withdrawn. Second, interest on capital is allowed only if the deed says so. Third, and this is where marks are won and lost, interest on capital is normally an appropriation, so it can never turn a profit into a loss or make a loss bigger.

That third point breaks into three situations you must be able to recognise instantly.

  • Profit is more than the total interest. Allow the interest in full; divide what is left in the profit-sharing ratio.
  • Profit is less than the total interest. Do not allow the full interest. Distribute the whole available profit in the ratio of the interest amounts, and share nothing further.
  • The firm made a loss. No interest on capital is allowed at all. The loss is shared in the profit-sharing ratio.
🔑 Key Rule
The three situations above apply when interest on capital is an appropriation, which is the normal case. If the question specifically says interest on capital is to be treated as a charge against profit, then it is allowed in full even if the firm made a loss, and the resulting larger loss is then shared in the profit-sharing ratio. Read the wording of the question carefully — one phrase changes the entire answer.
Example 8 — Working backwards to the opening capital
Kabir’s capital account on 31 March 2026 showed a closing balance of ₹5,40,000. During the year he withdrew ₹60,000, his share of profit credited was ₹1,20,000, and on 1 October 2025 he brought in additional capital of ₹1,00,000. Interest on capital is allowed at 10% per annum. Calculate the interest.

Step 1 — reverse the year. To go from closing back to opening, add back what was subtracted and subtract what was added.
Opening capital = 5,40,000 + 60,000 (drawings) − 1,20,000 (profit) − 1,00,000 (fresh capital) = ₹3,80,000.
Forward check: 3,80,000 + 1,00,000 + 1,20,000 − 60,000 = 5,40,000. ✓

Step 2 — interest on the opening capital, full year.
3,80,000 × 10% = ₹38,000.
Step 3 — interest on the additional capital, 1 October to 31 March, which is 6 months.
1,00,000 × 10% × 6/12 = ₹5,000.

Answer: Total interest on capital = 38,000 + 5,000 = ₹43,000.

Why it works: Interest rewards money for the time it actually stayed in the business. The extra ₹1,00,000 was only there for half the year, so it earns half a year of interest. Drawings are added back only while reconstructing the opening capital under the assumed fluctuating-capital method; interest on capital is then calculated on the time-weighted capital balance, while interest on drawings is handled separately.
Example 9 — When the profit is not enough
Pooja and Qadir are partners sharing profits 3:2, with capitals of ₹8,00,000 and ₹4,00,000. The deed allows interest on capital at 10% per annum. The firm earned a profit of only ₹90,000 for the year. Distribute it.

Step 1 — what the interest would have been.
Pooja = 8,00,000 × 10% = ₹80,000. Qadir = 4,00,000 × 10% = ₹40,000. Total = ₹1,20,000.

Step 2 — compare. The profit of ₹90,000 is less than ₹1,20,000, so the full interest cannot be allowed.

Step 3 — divide the whole profit in the ratio of the interest amounts, that is 80,000 : 40,000, which simplifies to 2:1.
Pooja = 90,000 × 2/3 = ₹60,000.
Qadir = 90,000 × 1/3 = ₹30,000.
Check: 60,000 + 30,000 = 90,000. ✓ Nothing is left, so no share of profit is distributed in the 3:2 ratio.

Why it works: The profit-sharing ratio of 3:2 is deliberately ignored here. The ₹90,000 is being paid out as interest, not as profit, so it must follow the interest ratio 2:1. Mixing up 3:2 and 2:1 is the single most common error in this topic.
💡 Exam Tip
In Example 9, always write one line of justification: “Since available profit ₹90,000 is less than interest on capital ₹1,20,000, it has been distributed in the ratio of interest, that is 2:1.” Board markers award a mark for that reasoning line even if a later figure slips.

Interest on Drawings: Product Method and Average Period Method

₹6,000 drawn at the BEGINNING of each month Months outstanding until 31 March 6,000Apr126,000May116,000Jun106,000Jul96,000Aug86,000Sep76,000Oct66,000Nov56,000Dec46,000Jan36,000Feb26,000Mar1 Average period = (12 + 1) ÷ 2 = 6.5 months
Why 6.5 appears: the first rupee waits 12 months, the last waits 1, and the average of the two ends is 6.5.

When a partner takes money out of the firm during the year, that money stops working for the business. If the deed says so, the firm charges interest on drawings (आहरण पर ब्याज) to compensate. There are two ways to compute it, and choosing the right one takes two seconds once you know the test.

Use the average period method when the amount drawn is the same every time and the intervals are regular — equal amounts every month, every quarter, every half-year. Use the product method when the amounts or the dates are irregular. That is the entire decision.

The average period is simply the average number of months the money stayed out of the business, and there is a shortcut: average period = (months for the first drawing + months for the last drawing) ÷ 2. The diagram above shows exactly why. Then interest = total drawings × rate × average period ÷ 12.

Example 10 — Equal monthly drawings, all three timings
Ishita withdrew ₹6,000 every month during the year ended 31 March 2026. Interest on drawings is charged at 12% per annum. Compute the interest if the money was drawn (a) at the beginning of each month, (b) at the end of each month, (c) in the middle of each month.

Total drawings = 6,000 × 12 = ₹72,000 in every case.

(a) Beginning of each month. Months outstanding run 12, 11, 10 … 1. Average period = (12 + 1) ÷ 2 = 6.5 months.
Interest = 72,000 × 12/100 × 6.5/12 = ₹4,680.

(b) End of each month. Months run 11, 10 … 0. Average period = (11 + 0) ÷ 2 = 5.5 months.
Interest = 72,000 × 12/100 × 5.5/12 = ₹3,960.

(c) Middle of each month. Months run 11.5, 10.5 … 0.5. Average period = (11.5 + 0.5) ÷ 2 = 6 months.
Interest = 72,000 × 12/100 × 6/12 = ₹4,320.

Why it works: The gap between (a) and (b) is exactly one month of interest on ₹72,000, which is 72,000 × 12% ÷ 12 = ₹720, and indeed 4,680 − 3,960 = 720. ✓ Use that as your instant sanity check.
Example 11 — Equal quarterly drawings
Devansh withdrew ₹15,000 at the end of each quarter during the year ended 31 March 2026. Interest on drawings is 10% per annum. Find the interest, and also what it would have been if he had drawn at the beginning of each quarter.

Total drawings = 15,000 × 4 = ₹60,000.

End of each quarter. The four withdrawals stay out for 9, 6, 3 and 0 months. Average period = (9 + 0) ÷ 2 = 4.5 months.
Interest = 60,000 × 10/100 × 4.5/12 = ₹2,250.

Beginning of each quarter. Months outstanding are 12, 9, 6 and 3. Average period = (12 + 3) ÷ 2 = 7.5 months.
Interest = 60,000 × 10/100 × 7.5/12 = ₹3,750.

Why it works: The difference between the two is three months of interest on ₹60,000: 60,000 × 10% × 3/12 = ₹1,500, and 3,750 − 2,250 = 1,500. ✓ A quarter is three months, so shifting every withdrawal to the start of its quarter buys the firm exactly three extra months of interest.
Example 12 — Irregular drawings: the product method
Tanvi drew the following amounts during the year ended 31 March 2026: ₹20,000 on 1 May 2025, ₹15,000 on 31 July 2025, ₹25,000 on 30 September 2025 and ₹10,000 on 1 January 2026. Interest on drawings is 9% per annum. Compute the interest by the product method.

The amounts differ and the dates are irregular, so the average period shortcut cannot be used. Count months from each date to 31 March 2026, multiply amount by months to get a “product”, and total the products.

See the table below the card. Total of products = ₹5,20,000.

Interest = Total products × rate ÷ 100 ÷ 12
= 5,20,000 × 9 ÷ 100 ÷ 12
= 46,800 ÷ 12 = ₹3,900.

Why it works: A product of ₹5,20,000 means “the equivalent of one rupee kept out for 5,20,000 months”. Multiplying by the yearly rate and dividing by 12 converts month-rupees into rupees of interest. Do not divide by 12 twice — that is the classic slip.
Calculation of Products (Example 12)
Date of drawingAmount (₹)Months up to 31 March 2026Product (₹)
1 May 202520,000112,20,000
31 July 202515,00081,20,000
30 September 202525,00061,50,000
1 January 202610,000330,000
Total70,0005,20,000
⚠️ Common Mistake
If the rate is given simply as “10%” with no words “per annum”, charge the flat 10% on total drawings and do not bring time into it at all. The time factor only applies when the rate is “per annum”. Underline the words “p.a.” in the question the moment you see them.
💡 Exam Tip
If a question says a partner withdrew a fixed sum every month but does not say when in the month, assume the middle of the month and use an average period of 6 months. Write that assumption down — examiners accept it and it protects your working.

Salary and Commission to Partners

Interest on capital rewards the money. Salary and commission reward the work. In many real firms one partner runs the shop every day while the other simply invested, so the deed gives the working partner a monthly salary, or a commission linked to profit, before the balance is split by the ratio.

Salary is easy: a fixed amount, usually stated per month, multiplied by twelve. Commission is where students lose marks, because a deed can express it in two very different ways.

  • Commission as a percentage of profit before charging such commission: Commission = Profit × Rate ÷ 100.
  • Commission as a percentage of profit after charging such commission: Commission = Profit × Rate ÷ (100 + Rate).
🔑 Key Rule
Why the second formula has 100 + Rate in the denominator: let the commission be C. “After charging such commission” means C must equal 10% of what is left once C has been taken out, so C = 10% of (Profit − C). Rearranging, 100C = 10 × Profit − 10C, so 110C = 10 × Profit, giving C = Profit × 10/110. Derive it once like this and you will never have to memorise it.
Example 13 — Before versus after, side by side
The net profit of a firm for the year was ₹5,50,000 before any commission. Rohit, a partner, is entitled to a commission of 10%. Compute his commission (a) if it is 10% of profit before charging such commission, (b) if it is 10% of profit after charging such commission.

(a) Before charging.
Commission = 5,50,000 × 10/100 = ₹55,000.
Profit remaining = 5,50,000 − 55,000 = ₹4,95,000.

(b) After charging.
Commission = 5,50,000 × 10/110 = ₹50,000.
Profit remaining = 5,50,000 − 50,000 = ₹5,00,000.
Verify the definition: is 50,000 exactly 10% of 5,00,000? Yes. ✓

Why it works: The verification line in (b) is the whole idea. Under “after charging”, the commission must equal the stated percentage of the amount that survives it. Under “before charging” it is simply a slice off the top. Notice the after-charging figure is always the smaller of the two — a quick way to catch a reversed formula.
Example 14 — Salary and commission together
Zoya is entitled to a salary of ₹1,20,000 per annum and a commission of 10% of the net profit remaining after charging her salary and her commission. Net profit for the year, before both, was ₹8,90,000. Find her commission.

Step 1 — deal with the salary first, because the commission is defined on what is left after it.
Profit after salary = 8,90,000 − 1,20,000 = ₹7,70,000.

Step 2 — apply the after-charging formula to that base.
Commission = 7,70,000 × 10/110 = ₹70,000.

Step 3 — verify. Profit remaining after both = 7,70,000 − 70,000 = ₹7,00,000. Is 70,000 equal to 10% of 7,00,000? Yes. ✓

So Zoya receives ₹1,20,000 as salary plus ₹70,000 as commission, and ₹7,00,000 remains for division in the profit-sharing ratio.

Why it works: The order matters. Because the wording says “after charging her salary and her commission”, the salary must come out before the 10/110 fraction is applied. If the wording had said only “after charging such commission”, you would have applied 10/110 to the full ₹8,90,000 instead, giving ₹80,909 — a completely different answer. Read the clause twice.
⚠️ Common Mistake
A commission to a manager is an expense of the business and belongs in the Profit and Loss Account — a charge. A commission to a partner is an appropriation and belongs in the Profit and Loss Appropriation Account. Same word, opposite treatment, depending on who receives it.

Distribution of Profit Among Partners

Now we put every piece together. Distribution of profit is the full journey: start with net profit, add back interest on drawings, subtract every appropriation in the “I Serve Real Shares” order, and carry the final shares into the partners’ accounts. The example below is a complete board-style question. Work through it with a pen before reading the solution.

Example 15 — The whole journey in one question
Ishaan and Tara share profits 3:2. Their fixed capitals are ₹10,00,000 and ₹6,00,000. The deed provides: interest on capital at 6% per annum; a salary of ₹15,000 per month to Tara; a transfer of ₹50,000 to General Reserve each year. Interest charged on drawings for the year was Ishaan ₹6,000 and Tara ₹4,000. Net profit for the year ended 31 March 2026 was ₹6,00,000. Prepare the appropriation account and the Current Accounts.

Step 1 — Interest on capital. Ishaan = 10,00,000 × 6% = ₹60,000. Tara = 6,00,000 × 6% = ₹36,000.
Step 2 — Salary. 15,000 × 12 = ₹1,80,000 to Tara.
Step 3 — Reserve. ₹50,000.
Step 4 — Credit side total. 6,00,000 + 6,000 + 4,000 = ₹6,10,000.
Step 5 — Divisible profit. 6,10,000 − (60,000 + 36,000 + 1,80,000 + 50,000) = 6,10,000 − 3,26,000 = ₹2,84,000.
Ishaan = 2,84,000 × 3/5 = ₹1,70,400. Tara = 2,84,000 × 2/5 = ₹1,13,600.
Step 6 — Prove it balances. 60,000 + 36,000 + 1,80,000 + 50,000 + 1,70,400 + 1,13,600 = ₹6,10,000 = credit side. ✓
Step 7 — Current Accounts.
Ishaan: 60,000 + 1,70,400 − 6,000 = ₹2,24,400 credit.
Tara: 36,000 + 1,80,000 + 1,13,600 − 4,000 = ₹3,25,600 credit.

Why it works: Notice that Tara ends up with far more than Ishaan even though she shares only two-fifths of the profit, because her salary rewards her daily work. That is precisely the fairness problem the whole chapter exists to solve.
Profit and Loss Appropriation Account for the year ended 31 March 2026 (Example 15)
Dr. ParticularsAmount (₹)Cr. ParticularsAmount (₹)
To Interest on Capital — Ishaan 60,000; Tara 36,00096,000By Profit and Loss A/c (net profit)6,00,000
To Salary — Tara1,80,000By Interest on Drawings — Ishaan6,000
To General Reserve50,000By Interest on Drawings — Tara4,000
To Profit transferred: Ishaan 1,70,400; Tara 1,13,6002,84,000
Total6,10,000Total6,10,000
Partners’ Current Accounts (Example 15)
Dr. ParticularsIshaan (₹)Tara (₹)Cr. ParticularsIshaan (₹)Tara (₹)
To Interest on Drawings6,0004,000By Interest on Capital60,00036,000
To Balance c/d2,24,4003,25,600By Salary—1,80,000
By P&L Appropriation A/c1,70,4001,13,600
Total2,30,4003,29,600Total2,30,4003,29,600
💡 Exam Tip
Always finish by adding both sides of the appropriation account and writing the equal totals. If they do not match, the error is almost always one of three things: interest on drawings put on the wrong side, a reserve transfer forgotten, or the ratio applied to net profit instead of to the divisible profit.

Guarantee of Minimum Profit to a Partner

Sometimes a firm wants to bring in a talented person who is nervous about giving up a steady salary. So the existing partners promise: “your share will be whatever the ratio gives you, but never less than a certain figure.” That promise is a guarantee of minimum profit.

The method is always the same three steps. First, divide the profit normally in the agreed ratio as if no guarantee existed. Second, compare the guaranteed partner’s normal share with the guaranteed amount. If the normal share is equal or higher, stop — the guarantee simply never activates. If it is lower, the shortfall is the deficiency. Third, take that deficiency away from whoever gave the guarantee.

Who bears the deficiency depends entirely on the wording. If the firm guaranteed the minimum, all the remaining partners bear it in their mutual profit-sharing ratio. If one named partner guaranteed it, that partner alone bears the whole deficiency. If two partners guaranteed it in a stated ratio, split it in that ratio.

🔑 Key Rule
The deficiency is never an extra payment from outside. It is only a transfer between partners. So after any guarantee adjustment, the total of all the partners’ final shares must still equal the original divisible profit exactly. Add them up every single time — it is a free check that catches almost every error.
Example 16 — Guarantee given by the firm
Xavier, Yash and Zoya are partners sharing profits 5:3:2. Zoya is guaranteed a minimum profit of ₹1,50,000 by the firm. Profit for the year was ₹6,00,000. Show the distribution.

Step 1 — divide normally in 5:3:2.
Xavier = 6,00,000 × 5/10 = ₹3,00,000.
Yash = 6,00,000 × 3/10 = ₹1,80,000.
Zoya = 6,00,000 × 2/10 = ₹1,20,000.

Step 2 — find the deficiency. Guaranteed ₹1,50,000 less normal share ₹1,20,000 = ₹30,000.

Step 3 — the firm guaranteed it, so Xavier and Yash bear it in their mutual ratio 5:3.
Xavier bears = 30,000 × 5/8 = ₹18,750.
Yash bears = 30,000 × 3/8 = ₹11,250.
Check: 18,750 + 11,250 = 30,000. ✓

Final shares.
Xavier = 3,00,000 − 18,750 = ₹2,81,250.
Yash = 1,80,000 − 11,250 = ₹1,68,750.
Zoya = ₹1,50,000.
Grand check: 2,81,250 + 1,68,750 + 1,50,000 = ₹6,00,000. ✓

Why it works: The “mutual ratio” of Xavier and Yash is 5:3, not 5:10 or 5/8 of the original ten parts. Zoya is out of the picture once her share is fixed, so only the other two shares are compared with each other.
Example 17 — Guarantee given by one partner
Amrita, Bilal and Chetan share profits 2:2:1. Chetan is guaranteed a minimum of ₹80,000, and the guarantee was given by Amrita alone. Profit for the year was ₹3,00,000. Show the distribution.

Step 1 — divide normally in 2:2:1.
Amrita = 3,00,000 × 2/5 = ₹1,20,000.
Bilal = 3,00,000 × 2/5 = ₹1,20,000.
Chetan = 3,00,000 × 1/5 = ₹60,000.

Step 2 — deficiency. 80,000 − 60,000 = ₹20,000.

Step 3 — Amrita alone bears the full ₹20,000. Bilal is untouched.

Final shares. Amrita = 1,20,000 − 20,000 = ₹1,00,000; Bilal = ₹1,20,000; Chetan = ₹80,000.
Check: 1,00,000 + 1,20,000 + 80,000 = ₹3,00,000. ✓

Why it works: Bilal’s share stays at exactly his normal 2/5 because he never made the promise. This produces the odd-looking result that Amrita and Bilal, who share equally, end up with different amounts. That is correct, and it is exactly what the examiner is checking.
⚠️ Common Mistake
If the guaranteed partner’s normal share already exceeds the guaranteed amount, do nothing at all. A guarantee is a floor, never a ceiling. Students sometimes “adjust” the extra back to the other partners, which is wrong and loses the whole question.

Guarantee clauses turn up again the moment the firm’s membership changes, so it is worth reading this alongside the accounting on retirement or death of a partner.

Past Adjustments and Adjustment Entries

Books get closed, profits get distributed, and then somebody notices an error. Interest on capital was forgotten. A salary was never allowed. A wrong ratio was used. Reopening a whole year of accounts would be absurd, so accountants do something far more elegant: they compute what should have happened, compare it with what did happen, and pass a single adjustment entry that moves money directly between the partners’ capital accounts.

The method is a small table with three rows. Row one: the amount each partner should have received. Row two: the amount each partner actually received. Row three: the difference. A positive difference means the partner was short-changed, so his capital account is credited. A negative difference means he was over-paid, so his capital account is debited. The three differences must add up to zero, because nothing new is entering the firm.

🔑 Key Rule
The differences must sum to zero. If your column does not total zero, do not pass the entry — go back and find the arithmetic slip. This is the only self-checking topic in the chapter, so use the check.
Example 18 — Interest on capital omitted
Prakash, Qamar and Reena share profits 2:2:1. Profit of ₹4,50,000 for the year ended 31 March 2025 was distributed among them in that ratio. Afterwards it was discovered that interest on capital at 10% per annum had been omitted. Their capitals throughout the year were ₹3,00,000, ₹2,00,000 and ₹1,00,000. Pass the necessary adjustment entry.

Step 1 — the interest that should have been allowed.
Prakash ₹30,000; Qamar ₹20,000; Reena ₹10,000. Total ₹60,000.

Step 2 — the profit that should then have been shared.
4,50,000 − 60,000 = ₹3,90,000, divided 2:2:1.
Prakash = ₹1,56,000; Qamar = ₹1,56,000; Reena = ₹78,000. Check: 1,56,000 + 1,56,000 + 78,000 = 3,90,000. ✓

Step 3 — what each should have received in total.
Prakash = 30,000 + 1,56,000 = ₹1,86,000.
Qamar = 20,000 + 1,56,000 = ₹1,76,000.
Reena = 10,000 + 78,000 = ₹88,000. Total ₹4,50,000. ✓

Step 4 — what each actually received (4,50,000 in 2:2:1).
Prakash ₹1,80,000; Qamar ₹1,80,000; Reena ₹90,000.

Step 5 — the difference.
Prakash: 1,86,000 − 1,80,000 = +₹6,000 (short-changed, credit him).
Qamar: 1,76,000 − 1,80,000 = −₹4,000 (over-paid, debit him).
Reena: 88,000 − 90,000 = −₹2,000 (over-paid, debit her).
Sum: +6,000 − 4,000 − 2,000 = 0. ✓

Adjustment entry:
Qamar’s Capital A/c  Dr.  ₹4,000
Reena’s Capital A/c  Dr.  ₹2,000
    To Prakash’s Capital A/c  ₹6,000
(Being interest on capital omitted earlier, now adjusted)

Why it works: Prakash has the largest capital, so the omitted interest hurt him most. Reena has the smallest capital but a full one-fifth of profit, so when ₹60,000 was pulled out of the divisible pool to pay interest, she lost more from the pool than she gained in interest. The table turns that intuition into exact rupees.
Statement of Adjustment (Example 18)
ParticularsPrakash (₹)Qamar (₹)Reena (₹)
Interest on capital now allowed (Cr.)30,00020,00010,000
Correct share of remaining profit ₹3,90,000 (Cr.)1,56,0001,56,00078,000
Total that should have been credited1,86,0001,76,00088,000
Less: profit already credited (Dr.)1,80,0001,80,00090,000
Net effect6,000 Cr.4,000 Dr.2,000 Dr.
💡 Exam Tip
Under the fixed capital method the same adjustment is passed through the Current Accounts, not the Capital Accounts. Check which method the question uses before you write the account names, and always add the narration in brackets — it carries a mark.

A quick note on scope: the official CBSE 2026-27 curriculum places the meaning, nature and need for valuation of goodwill, along with the average profit, super profit and capitalisation methods, in Unit 1 with Partnership Fundamentals. Hidden goodwill is normally applied in the later reconstitution chapters such as admission and retirement. Always confirm against the current syllabus PDF on cbseacademic.nic.in before your board exam, since only that document is authoritative. If you are moving on to company accounts next, our notes on the Cash Flow Statement for Class 12 pick up the thread, and you can test yourself with the PA 1 sample paper covering Chapters 1 to 3.

Practice Worksheet

Eleven original questions covering every sub-topic above. Write the full working on paper before you open an answer — reading a solution feels like learning, but writing one actually is.

Q1. Anand and Bhoomi have capitals of ₹5,00,000 and ₹1,00,000. There is no partnership deed. Profit for the year is ₹1,80,000. Bhoomi claims interest on capital at 20% and Anand claims profit in the ratio of capitals. Settle both claims and distribute the profit.
Both claims are rejected. With no deed, the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 applies: no interest on capital is allowed, and profits are shared equally regardless of capital.
Anand = 1,80,000 ÷ 2 = ₹90,000. Bhoomi = ₹90,000. Check: 90,000 + 90,000 = 1,80,000. ✓
Q2. Charu and Dev have capitals of ₹6,00,000 and ₹3,00,000. The deed allows interest on capital at 12% per annum. Profit for the year is only ₹81,000. Distribute it.
Interest that would be due: Charu = 6,00,000 × 12% = ₹72,000; Dev = 3,00,000 × 12% = ₹36,000; total ₹1,08,000.
Since ₹81,000 is less than ₹1,08,000, the entire profit is distributed in the ratio of interest, 72,000 : 36,000 = 2:1.
Charu = 81,000 × 2/3 = ₹54,000. Dev = 81,000 × 1/3 = ₹27,000. Check: 54,000 + 27,000 = 81,000. ✓ No further share of profit is distributed.
Q3. Esha withdrew ₹8,000 at the beginning of every month during the year ended 31 March 2026. Interest on drawings is 15% per annum. Compute the interest.
Total drawings = 8,000 × 12 = ₹96,000.
Drawn at the beginning, so months outstanding are 12 down to 1; average period = (12 + 1) ÷ 2 = 6.5 months.
Interest = 96,000 × 15/100 × 6.5/12 = 14,400 × 6.5/12 = ₹7,800.
Q4. Farhan withdrew ₹12,000 at the end of each quarter during the year. Interest on drawings is 8% per annum. Compute the interest.
Total drawings = 12,000 × 4 = ₹48,000.
Drawn at the end of each quarter, so months outstanding are 9, 6, 3 and 0; average period = (9 + 0) ÷ 2 = 4.5 months.
Interest = 48,000 × 8/100 × 4.5/12 = 3,840 × 4.5/12 = ₹1,440.
Q5. Gauri drew ₹30,000 on 1 June 2025, ₹18,000 on 1 October 2025 and ₹12,000 on 1 February 2026. Interest on drawings is 6% per annum and the year ends on 31 March 2026. Use the product method.
Months to 31 March 2026: 10, 6 and 2 respectively.
Products = (30,000 × 10) + (18,000 × 6) + (12,000 × 2) = 3,00,000 + 1,08,000 + 24,000 = ₹4,32,000.
Interest = 4,32,000 × 6/100 × 1/12 = 25,920 ÷ 12 = ₹2,160.
Q6. A firm’s net profit before commission is ₹6,60,000. Partner Harsh is entitled to a commission of 10%. Compute the commission (a) on profit before charging such commission, (b) on profit after charging such commission.
(a) Before charging: 6,60,000 × 10/100 = ₹66,000.
(b) After charging: 6,60,000 × 10/110 = ₹60,000.
Verification for (b): profit remaining = 6,60,000 − 60,000 = ₹6,00,000, and 10% of ₹6,00,000 is ₹60,000. ✓
Q7. Ira and Jatin share profits 3:2. Capitals are ₹6,00,000 and ₹4,00,000. Interest on capital is 5% per annum, Jatin gets a salary of ₹8,000 per month, and interest on drawings is Ira ₹4,000 and Jatin ₹3,000. Net profit is ₹5,00,000. Prepare the Profit and Loss Appropriation Account.
Interest on capital: Ira ₹30,000, Jatin ₹20,000 — total ₹50,000. Salary to Jatin = 8,000 × 12 = ₹96,000.
Credit side = 5,00,000 + 4,000 + 3,000 = ₹5,07,000.
Divisible profit = 5,07,000 − (50,000 + 96,000) = 5,07,000 − 1,46,000 = ₹3,61,000.
Ira = 3,61,000 × 3/5 = ₹2,16,600. Jatin = 3,61,000 × 2/5 = ₹1,44,400.
Debit side total = 50,000 + 96,000 + 2,16,600 + 1,44,400 = ₹5,07,000, equal to the credit side. ✓
Q8. Lakshay, Mihir and Naina share profits 3:2:1. Naina is guaranteed a minimum profit of ₹1,00,000 by the firm. Profit for the year is ₹4,80,000. Distribute it.
Normal shares: Lakshay = 4,80,000 × 3/6 = ₹2,40,000; Mihir = ₹1,60,000; Naina = ₹80,000.
Deficiency = 1,00,000 − 80,000 = ₹20,000, borne by Lakshay and Mihir in their mutual ratio 3:2.
Lakshay bears 20,000 × 3/5 = ₹12,000; Mihir bears 20,000 × 2/5 = ₹8,000.
Final: Lakshay ₹2,28,000, Mihir ₹1,52,000, Naina ₹1,00,000. Check: total = ₹4,80,000. ✓
Q9. Om, Priya and Rehan share profits 3:3:2. Rehan is guaranteed a minimum of ₹1,20,000, guaranteed by Priya alone. Profit for the year is ₹4,00,000. Distribute it.
Normal shares: Om = 4,00,000 × 3/8 = ₹1,50,000; Priya = ₹1,50,000; Rehan = 4,00,000 × 2/8 = ₹1,00,000.
Deficiency = 1,20,000 − 1,00,000 = ₹20,000, borne entirely by Priya.
Final: Om ₹1,50,000, Priya ₹1,30,000, Rehan ₹1,20,000. Check: total = ₹4,00,000. ✓ Om is untouched because he gave no guarantee.
Q10. Sana and Tarun share profits 3:2. Profit of ₹2,00,000 was distributed in that ratio. It was later found that Tarun’s salary of ₹36,000 per annum had been omitted. Pass the adjustment entry.
Correct treatment: Tarun’s salary ₹36,000 first; remaining profit = 2,00,000 − 36,000 = ₹1,64,000, shared 3:2.
Sana = 1,64,000 × 3/5 = ₹98,400. Tarun = 1,64,000 × 2/5 = ₹65,600, plus salary ₹36,000 = ₹1,01,600.
Should have received: Sana ₹98,400; Tarun ₹1,01,600. Total ₹2,00,000. ✓
Actually received: Sana ₹1,20,000; Tarun ₹80,000.
Difference: Sana −₹21,600 (over-paid); Tarun +₹21,600 (short-changed). Sum = 0. ✓
Equivalent shortcut: credit Tarun with the omitted salary of ₹36,000, then debit the same amount in the 3:2 profit-sharing ratio: Sana ₹21,600 and Tarun ₹14,400. Tarun’s net credit is therefore 36,000 − 14,400 = ₹21,600.
Entry: Sana’s Capital A/c Dr. ₹21,600  To Tarun’s Capital A/c ₹21,600 (Being partner’s salary omitted earlier, now adjusted).
Q11. Umang’s capital account showed a closing balance of ₹4,80,000 on 31 March 2026. During the year he withdrew ₹72,000 and was credited with a profit share of ₹96,000. He introduced additional capital of ₹60,000 on 1 July 2025. Interest on capital is 10% per annum. Find the opening capital and the interest.
Opening capital = 4,80,000 + 72,000 − 96,000 − 60,000 = ₹3,96,000.
Forward check: 3,96,000 + 60,000 + 96,000 − 72,000 = 4,80,000. ✓
Interest on opening capital = 3,96,000 × 10% = ₹39,600.
Interest on additional capital, 1 July to 31 March, which is 9 months = 60,000 × 10% × 9/12 = ₹4,500.
Total interest on capital = ₹44,100.

Kaizen, the Japanese idea of getting one percent better each day, fits this chapter perfectly: you do not master partnership accounts in one long night, you master them by balancing one more account correctly than you did yesterday. Pick one worked example tomorrow morning, close the page, and rebuild it from memory. Do that eleven times and the whole chapter is yours.

Written & reviewed by Team Principal Saab — Meet the team →