Take a breath. If the words “partnership firm” make you picture a wall of ledger columns and a teacher moving very fast, you are in good company. Almost every Class 12 student meets this chapter and feels the floor tilt a little. Here is the reassuring truth: Accounting for Partnership Firms: Fundamentals is not really about accounting at first. It is about fairness between friends. Two or three people put money and effort into one business, the business earns something, and somebody has to decide who gets what. Every rule, every account, every strange-looking format in this chapter exists only to answer that one human question honestly. We will build the whole thing from zero, in plain language, with every rupee figure worked out in front of you. The topic map here follows the NCERT Accountancy Part 1 textbook (2025 reprint of the rationalised edition), which is the book your board paper is written from.
By the time you reach the bottom of this page you will be able to open a blank sheet, look at any of the accounting for partnership firms fundamentals class 12 important questions, and know exactly which account to draw first. We will cover the profit and loss appropriation account format class 12 line by line through 18 computed and re-checked core examples, followed by an 11-question self-assessment worksheet.
Meet Your Tutor
Partnership accounting becomes much easier once every adjustment has a clear home. I will work beside you through the deed, capital accounts, appropriation, interest, guarantee and past-adjustment logic, pausing at each calculation so you can see not just what to write, but why the entry belongs there.
What You’ll Learn
- Partnership: Meaning and Features
- Partnership Deed and Its Contents
- Rules When There Is No Partnership Deed (Indian Partnership Act, 1932)
- Fixed and Fluctuating Capital Accounts
- Profit and Loss Appropriation Account Format Class 12
- Interest on Capital, Including When Profits Fall Short
- Interest on Drawings: Product Method and Average Period Method
- Salary and Commission to Partners
- Distribution of Profit Among Partners
- Guarantee of Minimum Profit to a Partner
- Past Adjustments and Adjustment Entries
- Practice Worksheet with Answers
Your Game Plan
Work through the chapter in this order. Each step rests on the one before it, so please resist the urge to jump ahead to the big formats.
- Understand what makes a group of people a partnership in law, not just in friendship.
- Learn what a partnership deed contains, and what the Act does for you when there is no deed.
- Get completely comfortable with the two ways of keeping capital accounts.
- Learn the Profit and Loss Appropriation Account as a story, not a format to memorise.
- Master the three arithmetic engines: interest on capital, interest on drawings, salary and commission.
- Handle the two special cases boards love: guarantee of minimum profit, and past adjustments.
- Finish with the worksheet at the end, writing full working, not just answers.
Study Notes
Partnership: Meaning and Features
A partnership (साझेदारी) is the relation between persons who have agreed to share the profits of a business carried on by all, or by any one of them acting for all. That sentence is from Section 4 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, and every phrase in it is doing work. Read it slowly with me.
“Persons who have agreed” — there must be an agreement. Two brothers who inherit a shop from their father are co-owners, but they are not partners until they agree to run it together. “Business” — there must be an actual trade or profession, not merely joint ownership of a flat. “Share the profits” — profit sharing is the giveaway sign. And “carried on by all, or by any one of them acting for all” — this is the phrase students always skip, and it is the most important one. It means mutual agency: each partner is both an owner and an agent of the firm. When one partner signs a supply contract, all the partners are bound by it. That is why partnership is a relationship built on trust rather than paperwork alone.
The features that follow from this definition are worth listing carefully, because one-mark questions come straight from them.
- Two or more persons — a minimum of two. Section 464 of the Companies Act, 2013 sets a statutory ceiling of 100, while Rule 10 of the Companies (Miscellaneous) Rules, 2014 currently prescribes a maximum of 50 persons for a partnership formed to carry on a business.
- Agreement — written or oral, but an agreement all the same. Partnership arises from contract, not from status.
- Lawful business — the object must be legal, and it must be a business.
- Profit sharing — profits (and by implication losses) are shared in an agreed ratio.
- Mutual agency — the true test. Every partner can bind the firm.
- Unlimited liability — if the firm’s assets fall short, partners pay from personal assets, jointly and severally.
- No separate legal entity — in law the firm is simply the partners collectively, which is exactly why a partner’s loan to the firm is treated differently from capital.
Working: Apply the four tests. Agreement to run a business together — no, they only inherited property. Business — no, letting out inherited property is not a business being carried on. Sharing of profits — they share income, but income from co-owned property is not business profit. Mutual agency — Neha cannot bind Farhan to a supply contract.
Answer: They are co-owners, not partners. Now change one fact: suppose they agree to convert the ground floor into a stationery shop, put in ₹2,00,000 each, and share profits equally. Every test is now satisfied, and from that date they are partners.
Why it works: The examiner is testing whether you can spot mutual agency. Sharing money alone is never enough — a manager paid a share of profits as a bonus is still an employee, because he cannot bind the firm.
Partnership Deed and Its Contents
A partnership deed (साझेदारी विलेख) is the written agreement among the partners. The law does not force you to have one. But going into business without a deed is like playing a match where nobody wrote down the rules and everyone remembers them differently the moment there is a dispute. The deed is written on the calm day so that it can speak on the difficult day.
A well-drafted deed usually covers: the name of the firm and the nature of business; the date of commencement and duration; the capital each partner contributes; the profit-sharing ratio; whether interest on capital is allowed and at what rate; whether interest on drawings is charged and how it is computed; salary or commission to any partner; the rights and duties of each partner; how accounts are to be kept and audited; the treatment of goodwill on admission, retirement or death; the procedure for admitting a new partner; and how disputes will be settled, usually by arbitration.
With a deed saying 3:2: Ritu = ₹3,00,000 × 3/5 = ₹1,80,000; Sameer = ₹3,00,000 × 2/5 = ₹1,20,000. Check: 1,80,000 + 1,20,000 = 3,00,000. ✓
With no deed: the Act forces an equal split — ₹1,50,000 each.
Answer: That single missing line costs Ritu ₹30,000 in one year.
Why it works: The Act never asks who contributed more capital. In the absence of agreement it treats partners as equals, full stop. This is exactly why deeds get written.
Rules When There Is No Partnership Deed (Indian Partnership Act, 1932)
When there is no deed at all, or the deed exists but is silent on a point, the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 quietly fills the gap. Four defaults matter for your exam, and they are shown in the flowchart above.
- Profits and losses are shared equally, no matter how unequal the capitals are.
- No interest on capital is allowed to any partner.
- No salary or commission is payable to any partner for extra work.
- Interest on a loan given by a partner to the firm is allowed at 6% per annum, and it is a charge against profit, so it is paid even if the firm makes a loss.
Step 1 — interest on Simran’s loan (a charge). The loan ran from 1 October to 31 March, which is 6 months.
Interest = ₹1,00,000 × 6/100 × 6/12 = ₹3,000.
Step 2 — find the divisible profit. ₹2,45,000 − ₹3,000 = ₹2,42,000.
Step 3 — divide it. No deed, so the split is equal, not 6:2.
Rahul = ₹2,42,000 ÷ 2 = ₹1,21,000; Simran = ₹1,21,000. Check: 1,21,000 + 1,21,000 = 2,42,000. ✓
Simran also receives ₹3,000 as loan interest, credited to her Loan A/c, not to her share of profit.
Why it works: The ₹3,000 is deducted before profit is divided because it is a charge — the shopkeeper’s bill in the Tiffin Rule. The equal division then follows because the Act refuses to look at capital sizes.
Claim 1 — Ayesha wants 10% interest on her capital of ₹5,00,000, that is ₹50,000. Rejected. In the absence of a deed no interest on capital is allowed. She gets ₹0.
Claim 2 — Vikram wants a salary of ₹10,000 a month because he manages the shop daily. Rejected. No salary is payable to a partner unless the deed says so. He gets ₹0. His extra effort is legally treated as an ordinary duty of a partner.
Claim 3 — Vikram lent the firm ₹2,00,000 for the full year and wants 12% interest, that is ₹24,000. Partly allowed. The Act fixes the rate at 6%.
Interest = ₹2,00,000 × 6/100 × 12/12 = ₹12,000.
Why it works: Two rejections and one partial allowance in one question is a classic three-mark board pattern. The examiner wants to see that you know the Act allows a rate, not a demand.
Fixed and Fluctuating Capital Accounts
Every partner’s money in the firm has two very different parts: the lump sum they originally committed, and the running stream of small credits and debits — interest, salary, share of profit, drawings. A firm must choose how to record these two parts, and there are exactly two choices.
Under the fluctuating capital method, everything goes into one account. The capital balance changes every single year, which is why it is called fluctuating. Under the fixed capital method, two accounts are kept for each partner: a Capital Account that holds only the original amount and any fresh capital brought in or permanently withdrawn, and a Current Account that absorbs everything else. The capital figure then sits still, year after year, like the foundation of a house, while the current account is the busy front room.
| Point of difference | Fixed Capital Method | Fluctuating Capital Method |
|---|---|---|
| Number of accounts | Two — Capital A/c and Current A/c | One — Capital A/c only |
| Change in capital balance | Stays the same unless fresh capital is brought in or withdrawn | Changes every year |
| Where interest on capital, salary, profit and drawings go | Current Account | Capital Account |
| Can the balance be a debit balance? | Capital A/c is always credit; Current A/c may be debit | Capital A/c itself may show a debit balance |
| Shown in the Balance Sheet | Capital and Current shown separately | One combined figure |
| Mention needed in the deed | Must be specifically agreed | Applies by default when nothing is said |
The next two examples use exactly the same facts, so you can see both methods side by side and watch where each rupee lands.
Step 1 — interest on capital.
Aarav = 5,00,000 × 8% = ₹40,000. Bhavna = 3,00,000 × 8% = ₹24,000. Total ₹64,000.
Step 2 — salary. ₹10,000 × 12 = ₹1,20,000 to Aarav.
Step 3 — profit left to share.
4,00,000 − (64,000 + 1,20,000) = 4,00,000 − 1,84,000 = ₹2,16,000.
Aarav = 2,16,000 × 3/5 = ₹1,29,600. Bhavna = 2,16,000 × 2/5 = ₹86,400. Check: 1,29,600 + 86,400 = 2,16,000. ✓
Step 4 — Current Accounts.
Aarav: 40,000 + 1,20,000 + 1,29,600 = 2,89,600, less drawings 60,000 = ₹2,29,600 credit.
Bhavna: 24,000 + 86,400 = 1,10,400, less drawings 40,000 = ₹70,400 credit.
Step 5 — Capital Accounts. Untouched: Aarav ₹5,00,000, Bhavna ₹3,00,000.
Why it works: Not one rupee of interest, salary, profit or drawings entered the Capital Account. That is the whole point of the fixed method — the owner’s committed stake is quarantined from the year’s traffic.
| Partners’ Current Accounts (Example 5) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Particulars | Aarav (₹) | Bhavna (₹) | Cr. Particulars | Aarav (₹) | Bhavna (₹) |
| To Drawings | 60,000 | 40,000 | By Interest on Capital | 40,000 | 24,000 |
| To Balance c/d | 2,29,600 | 70,400 | By Salary | 1,20,000 | — |
| By Profit and Loss Appropriation A/c | 1,29,600 | 86,400 | |||
| Total | 2,89,600 | 1,10,400 | Total | 2,89,600 | 1,10,400 |
No Current Account exists, so everything lands in the Capital Account.
Aarav: 5,00,000 + 40,000 (interest) + 1,20,000 (salary) + 1,29,600 (profit) − 60,000 (drawings) = ₹7,29,600.
Cross-check: 5,00,000 + 2,29,600 (the current account balance from Example 5) = 7,29,600. ✓
Bhavna: 3,00,000 + 24,000 + 86,400 − 40,000 = ₹3,70,400.
Cross-check: 3,00,000 + 70,400 = 3,70,400. ✓
Why it works: The two methods never change how much a partner is owed — only how the total is displayed. Under the fixed method the total sits in two boxes; under the fluctuating method it sits in one. That cross-check is a free way to verify your answer in the exam.
Profit and Loss Appropriation Account Format Class 12
The Profit and Loss Appropriation Account is simply the room where profit gets divided. It is not a trading account and it never decides how much the firm earned — that was already settled in the Profit and Loss Account. The appropriation account only decides who gets it.
The credit side receives what is coming in: net profit brought down, and interest charged on partners’ drawings, which is money flowing back to the firm. The debit side records what goes out to the partners: interest on capital, salary, commission, any transfer to a general reserve, and finally the balancing share of profit. Once you can see the diagram above in your head, the format writes itself.
Step 1 — interest on capital. Meera = 4,00,000 × 6% = ₹24,000. Nikhil = 6,00,000 × 6% = ₹36,000. Total ₹60,000.
Step 2 — salary. ₹5,000 × 12 = ₹60,000 to Nikhil.
Step 3 — total the credit side. 3,50,000 + 3,000 + 2,000 = ₹3,55,000.
Step 4 — profit left to share. 3,55,000 − (60,000 + 60,000) = ₹2,35,000.
Meera = 2,35,000 × 3/5 = ₹1,41,000. Nikhil = 2,35,000 × 2/5 = ₹94,000.
Step 5 — prove the account balances. Debit side = 60,000 + 60,000 + 1,41,000 + 94,000 = ₹3,55,000, which equals the credit side. ✓
Why it works: Interest on drawings sits on the credit side because it increases the pool available for division. Students who put it on the debit side end up with a difference of exactly twice the interest — a useful clue when your account will not balance.
| Profit and Loss Appropriation Account for the year ended 31 March 2026 (Example 7) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Particulars | Amount (₹) | Cr. Particulars | Amount (₹) |
| To Interest on Capital — Meera 24,000; Nikhil 36,000 | 60,000 | By Profit and Loss A/c (net profit) | 3,50,000 |
| To Salary — Nikhil | 60,000 | By Interest on Drawings — Meera | 3,000 |
| To Profit transferred: Meera 1,41,000 | 1,41,000 | By Interest on Drawings — Nikhil | 2,000 |
| To Profit transferred: Nikhil 94,000 | 94,000 | ||
| Total | 3,55,000 | Total | 3,55,000 |
Once this account is second nature, the harder chapters open up easily. The same appropriation logic reappears when a new partner joins — see our walkthrough of how profit is shared on the admission of a partner — and again in goodwill and change in profit-sharing ratio.
Interest on Capital, Including When Profits Fall Short
Interest on capital is the firm’s way of saying thank you to the money, separately from thanking the effort. A partner who brings in ₹10,00,000 has given up whatever that money could have earned elsewhere, so many deeds allow a fixed percentage on capital before the remaining profit is divided by the ratio.
Three practical points decide almost every question on this topic. First, interest is calculated on the opening capital, plus a time-proportionate amount on any capital introduced during the year, minus a time-proportionate amount on any capital permanently withdrawn. Second, interest on capital is allowed only if the deed says so. Third, and this is where marks are won and lost, interest on capital is normally an appropriation, so it can never turn a profit into a loss or make a loss bigger.
That third point breaks into three situations you must be able to recognise instantly.
- Profit is more than the total interest. Allow the interest in full; divide what is left in the profit-sharing ratio.
- Profit is less than the total interest. Do not allow the full interest. Distribute the whole available profit in the ratio of the interest amounts, and share nothing further.
- The firm made a loss. No interest on capital is allowed at all. The loss is shared in the profit-sharing ratio.
Step 1 — reverse the year. To go from closing back to opening, add back what was subtracted and subtract what was added.
Opening capital = 5,40,000 + 60,000 (drawings) − 1,20,000 (profit) − 1,00,000 (fresh capital) = ₹3,80,000.
Forward check: 3,80,000 + 1,00,000 + 1,20,000 − 60,000 = 5,40,000. ✓
Step 2 — interest on the opening capital, full year.
3,80,000 × 10% = ₹38,000.
Step 3 — interest on the additional capital, 1 October to 31 March, which is 6 months.
1,00,000 × 10% × 6/12 = ₹5,000.
Answer: Total interest on capital = 38,000 + 5,000 = ₹43,000.
Why it works: Interest rewards money for the time it actually stayed in the business. The extra ₹1,00,000 was only there for half the year, so it earns half a year of interest. Drawings are added back only while reconstructing the opening capital under the assumed fluctuating-capital method; interest on capital is then calculated on the time-weighted capital balance, while interest on drawings is handled separately.
Step 1 — what the interest would have been.
Pooja = 8,00,000 × 10% = ₹80,000. Qadir = 4,00,000 × 10% = ₹40,000. Total = ₹1,20,000.
Step 2 — compare. The profit of ₹90,000 is less than ₹1,20,000, so the full interest cannot be allowed.
Step 3 — divide the whole profit in the ratio of the interest amounts, that is 80,000 : 40,000, which simplifies to 2:1.
Pooja = 90,000 × 2/3 = ₹60,000.
Qadir = 90,000 × 1/3 = ₹30,000.
Check: 60,000 + 30,000 = 90,000. ✓ Nothing is left, so no share of profit is distributed in the 3:2 ratio.
Why it works: The profit-sharing ratio of 3:2 is deliberately ignored here. The ₹90,000 is being paid out as interest, not as profit, so it must follow the interest ratio 2:1. Mixing up 3:2 and 2:1 is the single most common error in this topic.
Interest on Drawings: Product Method and Average Period Method
When a partner takes money out of the firm during the year, that money stops working for the business. If the deed says so, the firm charges interest on drawings (आहरण पर ब्याज) to compensate. There are two ways to compute it, and choosing the right one takes two seconds once you know the test.
Use the average period method when the amount drawn is the same every time and the intervals are regular — equal amounts every month, every quarter, every half-year. Use the product method when the amounts or the dates are irregular. That is the entire decision.
The average period is simply the average number of months the money stayed out of the business, and there is a shortcut: average period = (months for the first drawing + months for the last drawing) ÷ 2. The diagram above shows exactly why. Then interest = total drawings × rate × average period ÷ 12.
Total drawings = 6,000 × 12 = ₹72,000 in every case.
(a) Beginning of each month. Months outstanding run 12, 11, 10 … 1. Average period = (12 + 1) ÷ 2 = 6.5 months.
Interest = 72,000 × 12/100 × 6.5/12 = ₹4,680.
(b) End of each month. Months run 11, 10 … 0. Average period = (11 + 0) ÷ 2 = 5.5 months.
Interest = 72,000 × 12/100 × 5.5/12 = ₹3,960.
(c) Middle of each month. Months run 11.5, 10.5 … 0.5. Average period = (11.5 + 0.5) ÷ 2 = 6 months.
Interest = 72,000 × 12/100 × 6/12 = ₹4,320.
Why it works: The gap between (a) and (b) is exactly one month of interest on ₹72,000, which is 72,000 × 12% ÷ 12 = ₹720, and indeed 4,680 − 3,960 = 720. ✓ Use that as your instant sanity check.
Total drawings = 15,000 × 4 = ₹60,000.
End of each quarter. The four withdrawals stay out for 9, 6, 3 and 0 months. Average period = (9 + 0) ÷ 2 = 4.5 months.
Interest = 60,000 × 10/100 × 4.5/12 = ₹2,250.
Beginning of each quarter. Months outstanding are 12, 9, 6 and 3. Average period = (12 + 3) ÷ 2 = 7.5 months.
Interest = 60,000 × 10/100 × 7.5/12 = ₹3,750.
Why it works: The difference between the two is three months of interest on ₹60,000: 60,000 × 10% × 3/12 = ₹1,500, and 3,750 − 2,250 = 1,500. ✓ A quarter is three months, so shifting every withdrawal to the start of its quarter buys the firm exactly three extra months of interest.
The amounts differ and the dates are irregular, so the average period shortcut cannot be used. Count months from each date to 31 March 2026, multiply amount by months to get a “product”, and total the products.
See the table below the card. Total of products = ₹5,20,000.
Interest = Total products × rate ÷ 100 ÷ 12
= 5,20,000 × 9 ÷ 100 ÷ 12
= 46,800 ÷ 12 = ₹3,900.
Why it works: A product of ₹5,20,000 means “the equivalent of one rupee kept out for 5,20,000 months”. Multiplying by the yearly rate and dividing by 12 converts month-rupees into rupees of interest. Do not divide by 12 twice — that is the classic slip.
| Calculation of Products (Example 12) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date of drawing | Amount (₹) | Months up to 31 March 2026 | Product (₹) |
| 1 May 2025 | 20,000 | 11 | 2,20,000 |
| 31 July 2025 | 15,000 | 8 | 1,20,000 |
| 30 September 2025 | 25,000 | 6 | 1,50,000 |
| 1 January 2026 | 10,000 | 3 | 30,000 |
| Total | 70,000 | 5,20,000 | |
Salary and Commission to Partners
Interest on capital rewards the money. Salary and commission reward the work. In many real firms one partner runs the shop every day while the other simply invested, so the deed gives the working partner a monthly salary, or a commission linked to profit, before the balance is split by the ratio.
Salary is easy: a fixed amount, usually stated per month, multiplied by twelve. Commission is where students lose marks, because a deed can express it in two very different ways.
- Commission as a percentage of profit before charging such commission: Commission = Profit × Rate ÷ 100.
- Commission as a percentage of profit after charging such commission: Commission = Profit × Rate ÷ (100 + Rate).
(a) Before charging.
Commission = 5,50,000 × 10/100 = ₹55,000.
Profit remaining = 5,50,000 − 55,000 = ₹4,95,000.
(b) After charging.
Commission = 5,50,000 × 10/110 = ₹50,000.
Profit remaining = 5,50,000 − 50,000 = ₹5,00,000.
Verify the definition: is 50,000 exactly 10% of 5,00,000? Yes. ✓
Why it works: The verification line in (b) is the whole idea. Under “after charging”, the commission must equal the stated percentage of the amount that survives it. Under “before charging” it is simply a slice off the top. Notice the after-charging figure is always the smaller of the two — a quick way to catch a reversed formula.
Step 1 — deal with the salary first, because the commission is defined on what is left after it.
Profit after salary = 8,90,000 − 1,20,000 = ₹7,70,000.
Step 2 — apply the after-charging formula to that base.
Commission = 7,70,000 × 10/110 = ₹70,000.
Step 3 — verify. Profit remaining after both = 7,70,000 − 70,000 = ₹7,00,000. Is 70,000 equal to 10% of 7,00,000? Yes. ✓
So Zoya receives ₹1,20,000 as salary plus ₹70,000 as commission, and ₹7,00,000 remains for division in the profit-sharing ratio.
Why it works: The order matters. Because the wording says “after charging her salary and her commission”, the salary must come out before the 10/110 fraction is applied. If the wording had said only “after charging such commission”, you would have applied 10/110 to the full ₹8,90,000 instead, giving ₹80,909 — a completely different answer. Read the clause twice.
Distribution of Profit Among Partners
Now we put every piece together. Distribution of profit is the full journey: start with net profit, add back interest on drawings, subtract every appropriation in the “I Serve Real Shares” order, and carry the final shares into the partners’ accounts. The example below is a complete board-style question. Work through it with a pen before reading the solution.
Step 1 — Interest on capital. Ishaan = 10,00,000 × 6% = ₹60,000. Tara = 6,00,000 × 6% = ₹36,000.
Step 2 — Salary. 15,000 × 12 = ₹1,80,000 to Tara.
Step 3 — Reserve. ₹50,000.
Step 4 — Credit side total. 6,00,000 + 6,000 + 4,000 = ₹6,10,000.
Step 5 — Divisible profit. 6,10,000 − (60,000 + 36,000 + 1,80,000 + 50,000) = 6,10,000 − 3,26,000 = ₹2,84,000.
Ishaan = 2,84,000 × 3/5 = ₹1,70,400. Tara = 2,84,000 × 2/5 = ₹1,13,600.
Step 6 — Prove it balances. 60,000 + 36,000 + 1,80,000 + 50,000 + 1,70,400 + 1,13,600 = ₹6,10,000 = credit side. ✓
Step 7 — Current Accounts.
Ishaan: 60,000 + 1,70,400 − 6,000 = ₹2,24,400 credit.
Tara: 36,000 + 1,80,000 + 1,13,600 − 4,000 = ₹3,25,600 credit.
Why it works: Notice that Tara ends up with far more than Ishaan even though she shares only two-fifths of the profit, because her salary rewards her daily work. That is precisely the fairness problem the whole chapter exists to solve.
| Profit and Loss Appropriation Account for the year ended 31 March 2026 (Example 15) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Particulars | Amount (₹) | Cr. Particulars | Amount (₹) |
| To Interest on Capital — Ishaan 60,000; Tara 36,000 | 96,000 | By Profit and Loss A/c (net profit) | 6,00,000 |
| To Salary — Tara | 1,80,000 | By Interest on Drawings — Ishaan | 6,000 |
| To General Reserve | 50,000 | By Interest on Drawings — Tara | 4,000 |
| To Profit transferred: Ishaan 1,70,400; Tara 1,13,600 | 2,84,000 | ||
| Total | 6,10,000 | Total | 6,10,000 |
| Partners’ Current Accounts (Example 15) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Particulars | Ishaan (₹) | Tara (₹) | Cr. Particulars | Ishaan (₹) | Tara (₹) |
| To Interest on Drawings | 6,000 | 4,000 | By Interest on Capital | 60,000 | 36,000 |
| To Balance c/d | 2,24,400 | 3,25,600 | By Salary | — | 1,80,000 |
| By P&L Appropriation A/c | 1,70,400 | 1,13,600 | |||
| Total | 2,30,400 | 3,29,600 | Total | 2,30,400 | 3,29,600 |
Guarantee of Minimum Profit to a Partner
Sometimes a firm wants to bring in a talented person who is nervous about giving up a steady salary. So the existing partners promise: “your share will be whatever the ratio gives you, but never less than a certain figure.” That promise is a guarantee of minimum profit.
The method is always the same three steps. First, divide the profit normally in the agreed ratio as if no guarantee existed. Second, compare the guaranteed partner’s normal share with the guaranteed amount. If the normal share is equal or higher, stop — the guarantee simply never activates. If it is lower, the shortfall is the deficiency. Third, take that deficiency away from whoever gave the guarantee.
Who bears the deficiency depends entirely on the wording. If the firm guaranteed the minimum, all the remaining partners bear it in their mutual profit-sharing ratio. If one named partner guaranteed it, that partner alone bears the whole deficiency. If two partners guaranteed it in a stated ratio, split it in that ratio.
Step 1 — divide normally in 5:3:2.
Xavier = 6,00,000 × 5/10 = ₹3,00,000.
Yash = 6,00,000 × 3/10 = ₹1,80,000.
Zoya = 6,00,000 × 2/10 = ₹1,20,000.
Step 2 — find the deficiency. Guaranteed ₹1,50,000 less normal share ₹1,20,000 = ₹30,000.
Step 3 — the firm guaranteed it, so Xavier and Yash bear it in their mutual ratio 5:3.
Xavier bears = 30,000 × 5/8 = ₹18,750.
Yash bears = 30,000 × 3/8 = ₹11,250.
Check: 18,750 + 11,250 = 30,000. ✓
Final shares.
Xavier = 3,00,000 − 18,750 = ₹2,81,250.
Yash = 1,80,000 − 11,250 = ₹1,68,750.
Zoya = ₹1,50,000.
Grand check: 2,81,250 + 1,68,750 + 1,50,000 = ₹6,00,000. ✓
Why it works: The “mutual ratio” of Xavier and Yash is 5:3, not 5:10 or 5/8 of the original ten parts. Zoya is out of the picture once her share is fixed, so only the other two shares are compared with each other.
Step 1 — divide normally in 2:2:1.
Amrita = 3,00,000 × 2/5 = ₹1,20,000.
Bilal = 3,00,000 × 2/5 = ₹1,20,000.
Chetan = 3,00,000 × 1/5 = ₹60,000.
Step 2 — deficiency. 80,000 − 60,000 = ₹20,000.
Step 3 — Amrita alone bears the full ₹20,000. Bilal is untouched.
Final shares. Amrita = 1,20,000 − 20,000 = ₹1,00,000; Bilal = ₹1,20,000; Chetan = ₹80,000.
Check: 1,00,000 + 1,20,000 + 80,000 = ₹3,00,000. ✓
Why it works: Bilal’s share stays at exactly his normal 2/5 because he never made the promise. This produces the odd-looking result that Amrita and Bilal, who share equally, end up with different amounts. That is correct, and it is exactly what the examiner is checking.
Guarantee clauses turn up again the moment the firm’s membership changes, so it is worth reading this alongside the accounting on retirement or death of a partner.
Past Adjustments and Adjustment Entries
Books get closed, profits get distributed, and then somebody notices an error. Interest on capital was forgotten. A salary was never allowed. A wrong ratio was used. Reopening a whole year of accounts would be absurd, so accountants do something far more elegant: they compute what should have happened, compare it with what did happen, and pass a single adjustment entry that moves money directly between the partners’ capital accounts.
The method is a small table with three rows. Row one: the amount each partner should have received. Row two: the amount each partner actually received. Row three: the difference. A positive difference means the partner was short-changed, so his capital account is credited. A negative difference means he was over-paid, so his capital account is debited. The three differences must add up to zero, because nothing new is entering the firm.
Step 1 — the interest that should have been allowed.
Prakash ₹30,000; Qamar ₹20,000; Reena ₹10,000. Total ₹60,000.
Step 2 — the profit that should then have been shared.
4,50,000 − 60,000 = ₹3,90,000, divided 2:2:1.
Prakash = ₹1,56,000; Qamar = ₹1,56,000; Reena = ₹78,000. Check: 1,56,000 + 1,56,000 + 78,000 = 3,90,000. ✓
Step 3 — what each should have received in total.
Prakash = 30,000 + 1,56,000 = ₹1,86,000.
Qamar = 20,000 + 1,56,000 = ₹1,76,000.
Reena = 10,000 + 78,000 = ₹88,000. Total ₹4,50,000. ✓
Step 4 — what each actually received (4,50,000 in 2:2:1).
Prakash ₹1,80,000; Qamar ₹1,80,000; Reena ₹90,000.
Step 5 — the difference.
Prakash: 1,86,000 − 1,80,000 = +₹6,000 (short-changed, credit him).
Qamar: 1,76,000 − 1,80,000 = −₹4,000 (over-paid, debit him).
Reena: 88,000 − 90,000 = −₹2,000 (over-paid, debit her).
Sum: +6,000 − 4,000 − 2,000 = 0. ✓
Adjustment entry:
Qamar’s Capital A/c Dr. ₹4,000
Reena’s Capital A/c Dr. ₹2,000
To Prakash’s Capital A/c ₹6,000
(Being interest on capital omitted earlier, now adjusted)
Why it works: Prakash has the largest capital, so the omitted interest hurt him most. Reena has the smallest capital but a full one-fifth of profit, so when ₹60,000 was pulled out of the divisible pool to pay interest, she lost more from the pool than she gained in interest. The table turns that intuition into exact rupees.
| Statement of Adjustment (Example 18) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Particulars | Prakash (₹) | Qamar (₹) | Reena (₹) |
| Interest on capital now allowed (Cr.) | 30,000 | 20,000 | 10,000 |
| Correct share of remaining profit ₹3,90,000 (Cr.) | 1,56,000 | 1,56,000 | 78,000 |
| Total that should have been credited | 1,86,000 | 1,76,000 | 88,000 |
| Less: profit already credited (Dr.) | 1,80,000 | 1,80,000 | 90,000 |
| Net effect | 6,000 Cr. | 4,000 Dr. | 2,000 Dr. |
A quick note on scope: the official CBSE 2026-27 curriculum places the meaning, nature and need for valuation of goodwill, along with the average profit, super profit and capitalisation methods, in Unit 1 with Partnership Fundamentals. Hidden goodwill is normally applied in the later reconstitution chapters such as admission and retirement. Always confirm against the current syllabus PDF on cbseacademic.nic.in before your board exam, since only that document is authoritative. If you are moving on to company accounts next, our notes on the Cash Flow Statement for Class 12 pick up the thread, and you can test yourself with the PA 1 sample paper covering Chapters 1 to 3.
Practice Worksheet
Eleven original questions covering every sub-topic above. Write the full working on paper before you open an answer — reading a solution feels like learning, but writing one actually is.
Q1. Anand and Bhoomi have capitals of ₹5,00,000 and ₹1,00,000. There is no partnership deed. Profit for the year is ₹1,80,000. Bhoomi claims interest on capital at 20% and Anand claims profit in the ratio of capitals. Settle both claims and distribute the profit.
Anand = 1,80,000 ÷ 2 = ₹90,000. Bhoomi = ₹90,000. Check: 90,000 + 90,000 = 1,80,000. ✓
Q2. Charu and Dev have capitals of ₹6,00,000 and ₹3,00,000. The deed allows interest on capital at 12% per annum. Profit for the year is only ₹81,000. Distribute it.
Since ₹81,000 is less than ₹1,08,000, the entire profit is distributed in the ratio of interest, 72,000 : 36,000 = 2:1.
Charu = 81,000 × 2/3 = ₹54,000. Dev = 81,000 × 1/3 = ₹27,000. Check: 54,000 + 27,000 = 81,000. ✓ No further share of profit is distributed.
Q3. Esha withdrew ₹8,000 at the beginning of every month during the year ended 31 March 2026. Interest on drawings is 15% per annum. Compute the interest.
Drawn at the beginning, so months outstanding are 12 down to 1; average period = (12 + 1) ÷ 2 = 6.5 months.
Interest = 96,000 × 15/100 × 6.5/12 = 14,400 × 6.5/12 = ₹7,800.
Q4. Farhan withdrew ₹12,000 at the end of each quarter during the year. Interest on drawings is 8% per annum. Compute the interest.
Drawn at the end of each quarter, so months outstanding are 9, 6, 3 and 0; average period = (9 + 0) ÷ 2 = 4.5 months.
Interest = 48,000 × 8/100 × 4.5/12 = 3,840 × 4.5/12 = ₹1,440.
Q5. Gauri drew ₹30,000 on 1 June 2025, ₹18,000 on 1 October 2025 and ₹12,000 on 1 February 2026. Interest on drawings is 6% per annum and the year ends on 31 March 2026. Use the product method.
Products = (30,000 × 10) + (18,000 × 6) + (12,000 × 2) = 3,00,000 + 1,08,000 + 24,000 = ₹4,32,000.
Interest = 4,32,000 × 6/100 × 1/12 = 25,920 ÷ 12 = ₹2,160.
Q6. A firm’s net profit before commission is ₹6,60,000. Partner Harsh is entitled to a commission of 10%. Compute the commission (a) on profit before charging such commission, (b) on profit after charging such commission.
(b) After charging: 6,60,000 × 10/110 = ₹60,000.
Verification for (b): profit remaining = 6,60,000 − 60,000 = ₹6,00,000, and 10% of ₹6,00,000 is ₹60,000. ✓
Q7. Ira and Jatin share profits 3:2. Capitals are ₹6,00,000 and ₹4,00,000. Interest on capital is 5% per annum, Jatin gets a salary of ₹8,000 per month, and interest on drawings is Ira ₹4,000 and Jatin ₹3,000. Net profit is ₹5,00,000. Prepare the Profit and Loss Appropriation Account.
Credit side = 5,00,000 + 4,000 + 3,000 = ₹5,07,000.
Divisible profit = 5,07,000 − (50,000 + 96,000) = 5,07,000 − 1,46,000 = ₹3,61,000.
Ira = 3,61,000 × 3/5 = ₹2,16,600. Jatin = 3,61,000 × 2/5 = ₹1,44,400.
Debit side total = 50,000 + 96,000 + 2,16,600 + 1,44,400 = ₹5,07,000, equal to the credit side. ✓
Q8. Lakshay, Mihir and Naina share profits 3:2:1. Naina is guaranteed a minimum profit of ₹1,00,000 by the firm. Profit for the year is ₹4,80,000. Distribute it.
Deficiency = 1,00,000 − 80,000 = ₹20,000, borne by Lakshay and Mihir in their mutual ratio 3:2.
Lakshay bears 20,000 × 3/5 = ₹12,000; Mihir bears 20,000 × 2/5 = ₹8,000.
Final: Lakshay ₹2,28,000, Mihir ₹1,52,000, Naina ₹1,00,000. Check: total = ₹4,80,000. ✓
Q9. Om, Priya and Rehan share profits 3:3:2. Rehan is guaranteed a minimum of ₹1,20,000, guaranteed by Priya alone. Profit for the year is ₹4,00,000. Distribute it.
Deficiency = 1,20,000 − 1,00,000 = ₹20,000, borne entirely by Priya.
Final: Om ₹1,50,000, Priya ₹1,30,000, Rehan ₹1,20,000. Check: total = ₹4,00,000. ✓ Om is untouched because he gave no guarantee.
Q10. Sana and Tarun share profits 3:2. Profit of ₹2,00,000 was distributed in that ratio. It was later found that Tarun’s salary of ₹36,000 per annum had been omitted. Pass the adjustment entry.
Sana = 1,64,000 × 3/5 = ₹98,400. Tarun = 1,64,000 × 2/5 = ₹65,600, plus salary ₹36,000 = ₹1,01,600.
Should have received: Sana ₹98,400; Tarun ₹1,01,600. Total ₹2,00,000. ✓
Actually received: Sana ₹1,20,000; Tarun ₹80,000.
Difference: Sana −₹21,600 (over-paid); Tarun +₹21,600 (short-changed). Sum = 0. ✓
Equivalent shortcut: credit Tarun with the omitted salary of ₹36,000, then debit the same amount in the 3:2 profit-sharing ratio: Sana ₹21,600 and Tarun ₹14,400. Tarun’s net credit is therefore 36,000 − 14,400 = ₹21,600.
Entry: Sana’s Capital A/c Dr. ₹21,600 To Tarun’s Capital A/c ₹21,600 (Being partner’s salary omitted earlier, now adjusted).
Q11. Umang’s capital account showed a closing balance of ₹4,80,000 on 31 March 2026. During the year he withdrew ₹72,000 and was credited with a profit share of ₹96,000. He introduced additional capital of ₹60,000 on 1 July 2025. Interest on capital is 10% per annum. Find the opening capital and the interest.
Forward check: 3,96,000 + 60,000 + 96,000 − 72,000 = 4,80,000. ✓
Interest on opening capital = 3,96,000 × 10% = ₹39,600.
Interest on additional capital, 1 July to 31 March, which is 9 months = 60,000 × 10% × 9/12 = ₹4,500.
Total interest on capital = ₹44,100.
Kaizen, the Japanese idea of getting one percent better each day, fits this chapter perfectly: you do not master partnership accounts in one long night, you master them by balancing one more account correctly than you did yesterday. Pick one worked example tomorrow morning, close the page, and rebuild it from memory. Do that eleven times and the whole chapter is yours.

